A comparison of two global positioning system devices for team-sport running protocols |
| |
| Institution: | 1. University of Brighton, Environmental Extremes Laboratory, Eastbourne BN20 7SN, UK;2. Institut Sukan Negara, National Sport Institute, National Sport Complex, Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia;3. St Mary’s University, Twickenham, London TW1 4SX, UK;1. Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra (UCRISE), Australia;2. Discipline of Sport and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Australia;3. Australian Institute of Sport (AIS), Australia;1. School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Australia;2. Gabbett Performance Solutions, Australia;3. School of Exercise Science, Australian Catholic University, Australia;1. Sport and Exercise Subject Group, School of Social Sciences and Law, Teesside University, United Kingdom;2. School of Science and Health, University of Western Sydney, Australia;3. Greater Western Sydney Giants, Australia;1. Centre for Exercise & Sports Science, School of Exercise & Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;2. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia;3. School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia;4. Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;1. Sport & Exercise Discipline Group, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Australia;2. Panthers Rugby League Football Club, Australia |
| |
| Abstract: | The comparability and reliability of global positioning system (GPS) devices during running protocols associated with team-sports was investigated. Fourteen moderately-trained males completed 690 m of straight-line movements, a 570 m change of direction (COD) course and a 642.5 m team-sport simulated circuit (TSSC); on two occasions. Participants wore a FieldWiz GPS device and a Catapult MinimaxX S4 10-Hz GPS device. Typical error of measurement (TE) and coefficient of variation (CV%) were calculated between GPS devices, for the variables of total distance and peak speed. Reliability comparisons were made within FieldWiz GPS devices, between sessions. Small TE were observed between FieldWiz and Catapult GPS devices for total distance and peak speed during straight-line (16.9 m 2%], 1.2 km·h−1 4%]), COD (31.8 m 6%], 0.4 km·h−1 2%]) and TSSC protocols (12.9 m 2%], 0.5 km·h−1 2%]), respectively, with no significant mean bias (p > 0.05). Small TE were also observed for the FieldWiz GPS device between sessions (p > 0.05) for straight-line (9.6 m 1%], 0.2 km·h−1 1%]), COD (12.8 m 2%], 0.2 km·h−1 1%]) and TSSC protocols (6.9 m 1%], 0.6 km·h−1 2%]), respectively. Data from the FieldWiz GPS device appears comparable to established devices and reliable across a range of movement patterns associated with team-sports. |
| |
| Keywords: | GPS Team-sports Training load Performance analysis |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
