首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Cross-correlations between gluteal muscle thickness derived from ultrasound imaging and hip biomechanics during walking gait
Institution:1. University of Virginia Exercise and Sports Injury Lab, 210 Emmet Street South, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4407, USA;2. Texas State University Biomechanics/Sports Medicine Lab, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX 78666-4616, USA;1. Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy;2. Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zürich, Switzerland;3. Bioengineering Research Group, University of Southampton, United Kingdom;4. Laboratorio di Bioingegneria Computazionale, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy;1. Department of Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcon, Madrid, Spain;2. Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Carretera de Alfacar, s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain
Abstract:Ultrasound imaging (USI) of muscle thickness offers different insights into musculoskeletal function than kinematics, kinetics, and surface electromyography (sEMG), however it is unknown how USI-derived measures correlate to traditional measures during walking. The purpose of this study was to compare USI-derived gluteus maximus (GMAX) and medius (GMED) thickness measures to tri-planar hip kinematics and kinetics, and GMED thickness to sEMG amplitude. Fourteen females walked on a treadmill at 1.34 m/s. GMAX and GMED thickness, hip tri-planar kinematics, kinetics, and GMED sEMG were simultaneously recorded. USI-derived thickness measures were compared to other biomechanical outcomes using cross-correlation analyses, computed at each 1% (11-ms) of the gait cycle with lag times from ?20% to 20%. GMED and GMAX thickness measures were most strongly correlated with hip extension and abduction angles at 150–220-ms lags (cross-correlation coefficients CCF]: ?0.34; ?0.83). GMED thickness was most correlated to abduction and external rotation moments simultaneously (CCF: ?0.28; ?0.47). GMAX thickness and flexion moments were most strongly correlated at a 66-ms lag (CCF: 0.33). GMED sEMG amplitude was most strongly correlated to muscle thickness at a 99-ms lag (CCF: 0.39). These results elucidate the unique information provided from USI-derived measures of gluteal muscle thickness during walking.
Keywords:Electromechanical delay  Gait analysis  Neuromuscular adaptations  Musculoskeletal ultrasound
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号