首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Species-specific responses of planktivorous fish to the introduction of a new piscivore: implications for prey fitness
Authors:FRANZ HÖLKER  HENDRIK DÖRNER  TORSTEN SCHULZE  SUSANNE S HAERTEL-BORER  SCOTT D PEACOR  THOMAS MEHNER
Institution:Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany; AGRIFISH Unit, DG Joint Research Centre (JRC), Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen (IPSC), European Commission, Ispra, Italy; Institute of Hydrobiology, Technische Universit̋t Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Limnological Institute, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany; Swiss Fisheries Advisory Service (FIBER), c/o EAWAG, Kastanienbaum, Switzerland; Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, and Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory (NOAA), Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.A.
Abstract:1. Antipredator behaviour by the facultative planktivorous fish species roach (Rutilus rutilus), perch (Perca fluviatilis) and rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus) was studied in a multi‐year whole‐lake experiment to evaluate species‐specific behavioural and numerical responses to the stocking of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca), a predator with different foraging behaviour than the resident predators large perch (P. fluviatilis) and pike (Esox lucius). 2. Behavioural responses to pikeperch varied greatly during the night, ranging from reduced activity (roach and small perch) and a shift in habitat (roach), to no change in the habitat use and activity of rudd. The differing responses of the different planktivorous prey species highlight the potential variation in behavioural response to predation risk from species of similar vulnerability. 3. These differences had profound effects on fitness; the density of species that exhibited an antipredator response declined only slightly (roach) or even increased (small perch), whereas the density of the species that did not exhibit an antipredator response (rudd) decreased dramatically (by more than 80%). 4. The maladaptive behaviour of rudd can be explained by a ‘behavioural syndrome’, i.e. the interdependence of behaviours expressed in different contexts (feeding activity, antipredator) across different situations (different densities of predators). 5. Our study extends previous studies, that have typically been limited to more controlled situations, by illustrating the variability in intensity of phenotypic responses to predators, and the consequences for population density, in a large whole‐lake setting.
Keywords:fixed behaviour  habitat preference  multiple predator  multiple prey  phenotypic plasticity
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号