首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

NaCl胁迫对两种南瓜幼苗离子含量的影响
引用本文:王冉,陈贵林,宋炜,吕桂云,梁静,李卫欣.NaCl胁迫对两种南瓜幼苗离子含量的影响[J].植物生理与分子生物学学报,2006,32(1):94-98.
作者姓名:王冉  陈贵林  宋炜  吕桂云  梁静  李卫欣
作者单位:1. 内蒙古大学生命科学学院,呼和浩特,010021;河北农业大学园艺学院,保定,071001
2. 内蒙古大学生命科学学院,呼和浩特,010021
3. 河北省农林科学院粮油作物研究所,石家庄,050031
4. 河北农业大学园艺学院,保定,071001
基金项目:内蒙古自然科学基金;农业部重点实验室基金;内蒙古大学校科研和教改项目;内蒙古大学校科研和教改项目
摘    要:NaCl胁迫7d明显抑制了两种南瓜——黑籽南瓜(Cucurbita ficifolia Bouche.)和白籽南瓜(Cucurbita moschata Duch.)幼苗地上部和根系的生长,使地上部相对含水量明显下降。随NaCl胁迫浓度(150、300和500mmol/L)的提高,两种南瓜幼苗根、茎和叶片中Na^+含量明显增加,K^+含量明显下降。Na^+和K^+含量在两个南瓜品种各器官中的分布规律分别是:根〉茎〉叶片和茎〉叶片〉根。NaCl胁迫后黑籽南瓜根、茎和叶片Na^+含量远低于白籽南瓜,而叶片游离脯氨酸含量、可溶性糖含量和地上部相对含水量明显高于白籽南瓜。表明两者在渗透调节方式、离子的吸收和运输能力上有差异,黑籽南瓜耐盐性较强。

关 键 词:南瓜  黑籽南瓜  白籽南瓜  离子  渗透调节
收稿时间:2005-10-14
修稿时间:2005-12-12

Effects of NaCl Stress on Cation Contents in Seedlings of Two Pumpkin Varieties
WANG Ran,CHEN Gui-Lin,SONG Wei,L Gui-Yun,LIANG Jing,LI Wei-Xin.Effects of NaCl Stress on Cation Contents in Seedlings of Two Pumpkin Varieties[J].Journal Of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology,2006,32(1):94-98.
Authors:WANG Ran  CHEN Gui-Lin  SONG Wei  L Gui-Yun  LIANG Jing  LI Wei-Xin
Institution:1 College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Huhhot 010021, China; 2 College of Horticulture, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding 071001, China; 3 Institute of Cereal and Oil Crops, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Science, Shifiazhuang 050031, China
Abstract:Effects of different concentration NaClstress on cation contents of pumpkin cultivars(Cucurbita ficifolia and Cucurbita moschata) usu-ally used as rootstocks of cucumber was studied. Theresults showed that, in both cultivars treated with 150,300 and 500 mmol/L NaCl for 7 d, increasing salinitycaused in increasing retardation of shoot and rootgrowth, and reduction of shoot relative water content(Table 1). With increasing NaCl concentration, Na+content increased while K+ content decreased distinctlyin roots, stems and leaves of both cultivars. And Na+and K+ contents in different organs were in the ordersroots>stems>leaves and stems>leaves>roots respec-tively (Fig.3). There were less Na+ in root, stem andleaf (Fig.3), more free proline and soluble sugar inleaves (Figs.1, 2), and higher shoot relative water con-tent (Table 1) in C. ficifolia than in C. moschata. Sothere are differences between C. ficifolia and C.moschata in osmotic adjustment mechanisms and se-lective absorption and transportation of differentcations, and the salt tolerance of C. ficifolia is higherthan C. moschata.
Keywords:NaCl
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号