Comparative study between Larval Packet Test and Larval Immersion Test to assess the effect of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Metarhizium anisopliae</Emphasis> on <Emphasis Type="Italic">Rhipicephalus microplus</Emphasis> tick larvae

Entomopathogenic fungi, such as Metarhizium anisopliae, for the control of arthropods, have been studied for more than 20 years. The aim of this study was to determine the best methodology to evaluate the in vitro effect of the fungus M. anisopliae on Rhipicephalus microplus tick larvae. We compared a modified Larval Packet Test (LPT) and a Larval Immersion Test (LIT). For the LPT filter papers were impregnated with 1 mL of M. anisopliae suspension in Triton X-100 at 0.02%, in concentrations of 10⁶, 10⁷ and 10⁸ conidia/mL and subsequently folded to include the larval ticks. LIT was performed by immersing the larvae in M. anisopliae suspensions for 5 min using the same three concentrations, then the larvae were placed on filter paper clips. For LPT, the LT₅₀ values obtained were 134.6, 27.2 and 24.8 days for concentrations of 10⁶, 10⁷ and 10⁸ conidia/mL; and the mortality after 21 days was 17.3, 17.6 and 38%, respectively. The LT₅₀ values of LIT were 24.5, 20 and 9.2 days with mortality after 21 days of 50.5, 64.7 and 98% for 10⁶, 10⁷ and 10⁸ conidia/mL, respectively. For the same conidia concentration, LIT showed a higher mortality in a shorter time interval when compared with LPT. These differences between the methods tested must be taking into account in further screening and effect studies with M. anisopliae. The set of results shown here could optimize the protocol used to identify M. anisopliae strains pathogenic against R. microplus.