首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

保水剂用量对小麦不同生育期根系生理特性的影响
引用本文:杨永辉,武继承,吴普特,黄占斌,赵西宁,管秀娟,何方.保水剂用量对小麦不同生育期根系生理特性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(1):73-78.
作者姓名:杨永辉  武继承  吴普特  黄占斌  赵西宁  管秀娟  何方
作者单位:1. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院,陕西杨凌,712100;河南省农业科学院植物营养与资源环境研究所,郑州,450002;中国科学院-水利部水土保持研究所,陕西杨凌,712100
2. 河南省农业科学院植物营养与资源环境研究所,郑州,450002
3. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院,陕西杨凌,712100;中国科学院-水利部水土保持研究所,陕西杨凌,712100
4. 中国矿业大学(北京),北京,100083
基金项目:国家高技术研究发展计划节水农业项目,河南省重大公益性科研项目,河南省杰出青年基金
摘    要:在河南禹州试验基地进行田间试验,研究了保水剂不同施用量(0、30、60、90 kg·hm-2)对两个冬小麦品种(郑麦9694和矮抗58)根系生理生化特征、生物量及产量的影响,以探明保水剂对不同生育阶段冬小麦根系的作用机理.结果表明:施用保水剂降低了冬小麦根系质膜透性和可溶性糖含量,提高了根系活力.在各生育期,郑麦9694根系质膜透性降低幅度均大于矮抗58;除90 kg·hm-2处理外,矮抗58的根系活力均显著大于郑麦9694.在孕穗期和灌浆期,郑麦9694的可溶性糖含量降低幅度显著大于矮抗58.在各生育期内,60 kg·hm-2处理的两品种质膜透性和可溶性糖含量均最小,90 kg·hm-2与60 kg·hm-2处理差异不显著.随保水剂用量的增加,郑麦9694的根系活力显著提高,而矮抗58 在60 kg·hm-2处理下最高.施用保水剂还提高了小麦根系生物量,在拔节期和孕穗期,矮抗58的根系生物量大于郑麦9694;而在灌浆期,矮抗58在60 kg·hm-2和90 kg·hm-2处理下根系生物量显著低于郑麦9694.郑麦9694和矮抗58产量均以60 kg·hm-2处理增幅最高.综上,保水剂对郑麦9694的作用效果较矮抗58显著,并以60 kg·hm-2施用量为佳.

关 键 词:保水剂  冬小麦  根系  生理特征  生物量

Effects of different application rates of water-retaining agent on root physiological characteristics of winter wheat at its different growth stages
YANG Yong-hui,WU Ji-cheng,WU Pu-te,HUANG Zhan-bin,ZHAO Xi-ning,GUAN Xiu-juan,HE Fang.Effects of different application rates of water-retaining agent on root physiological characteristics of winter wheat at its different growth stages[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2011,22(1):73-78.
Authors:YANG Yong-hui  WU Ji-cheng  WU Pu-te  HUANG Zhan-bin  ZHAO Xi-ning  GUAN Xiu-juan  HE Fang
Institution:1College of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Northwest A &|F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;2Institute of Plant Nutrition &|Resource Environment, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450002, China|3Institute of Soil and Water Conservation|Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;4China University of Mining &|Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
Abstract:A field experiment was conducted at the Yuzhou Experimental Base of Henan Province to study the effects of different application rates (0, 30, 60, and
90 kg·hm-2) of water-retaining agent (WRA) on the root physiological characteristics, biomass, and grain yield of two winter wheat cultivars Zhengmai-9694 and Aikang-58, aimed to probe into the action mechanisms of WRA on the root system of winter wheat at its different growth stages. The application of WRA decreased the root membrane permeability and soluble sugar content, and increased the root vigor. After the application of WRA, the Zhengmai-9694 at its different growth stages had a greater decrement of root membrane permeability, compared with Aikang-58. In all treatments except 90 kg·hm-2 of WRA, the root vigor of Aikang-58 was obviously higher than that of Zhengmai-9694. At booting and grain-filling stages, the root soluble sugar content of Zhengmai-9694 decreased much more than that of Aikang-58. In the whole growth period of the two cultivars, their root membrane permeability and soluble sugar content were the lowest in treatment 60 kg·hm-2 of WRA, and no significant differences were observed between treatments 60 and 90 kg·hm-2 of WRA. The root vigor of Zhengmai-9694 increased remarkably with the increasing rate of WRA application, while that of Aikang-58 was the highest in treatment 60 kg·hm-2 of WRA. The application of WRA also increased root biomass, and at jointing and booting stages, the root biomass of Aikang-58 was much higher than that of Zhengmai-9694. However, at grain-filling stage, the biomass of Aikang-58 in treatments 60 and 90 kg·hm-2 of WRA was lower than that of Zhengmai-9694. Treatment 60 kg·hm-2 of WRA had the highest grain yield of the two cultivars. It was concluded that WRA had more significant effects on Zhengmai-9694 than on Aikang-58, and applying 60 kg·hm-2 of WRA could obtain the best effect.
Keywords:water-retaining agent  winter wheat  root  physiological characteristics  biomass
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号