首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

不同缓控释肥对鲜食玉米产量、品质及氨挥发的影响
引用本文:安文博,孙焱鑫,李占台,王激清,邹国元,杨俊刚.不同缓控释肥对鲜食玉米产量、品质及氨挥发的影响[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(7):2422-2430.
作者姓名:安文博  孙焱鑫  李占台  王激清  邹国元  杨俊刚
作者单位:1.北京市农林科学院植物营养与资源研究所, 新型肥料研究与应用创新团队, 北京 100097;2.河北北方学院农林科技学院, 河北张家口 075000;3.北京市缓控释肥料工程技术研究中心, 北京 100097
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFD0200601)、北京市粮经作物产业创新团队(BAIC09-2019)和国家玉米产业技术体系项目(CARS-02-88)资助
摘    要:采用田间试验,设置不施氮对照(CK)、常规施肥(U)、增效尿素(DU)、包膜尿素(CU)、缓控释掺混尿素(CDU)共5个处理,研究了常规施肥(240 kg N·hm-2)和不同缓控释肥料一次性减量施用(180 kg N·hm-2)对鲜食玉米产量、品质与土壤无机氮变化和氨挥发的影响。结果表明: U处理氨挥发总量最高,追肥是产生氨挥发损失的重要因素;与U处理相比,DU、CU、CDU处理氨挥发减排78%~81%。收获后U处理80~100 cm土层硝态氮浓度最高,为51.6 mg·kg-1,氮淋溶风险较高,而DU、CU、CDU处理同土层硝态氮含量均较低,降低了淋溶风险。与U处理相比,减氮25%的3个缓控释肥处理没有减产,并增加了籽粒维生素C、可溶性糖和蛋白质含量;缓控释肥处理之间,DU处理的氮肥农学效率和经济效益最高。综上,减量施用新型缓控释肥可以实现鲜食玉米稳产提质,显著降低氨挥发损失和硝态氮淋失风险。与成本较高的树脂包膜控释肥相比,双效抑制剂增效肥(DU)成本低、制作便捷,是鲜食玉米专用肥的较好选择。

关 键 词:鲜食玉米  包膜尿素  增效尿素  氨挥发  减量施肥  
收稿时间:2019-11-04

Effects of different slow/controlled release fertilizers on yield,quality of fresh maize and ammonia emissions
AN Wen-bo,SUN Yan-xin,LI Zhan-tai,WANG Ji-qing,ZOU Guo-yuan,YANG Jun-gang.Effects of different slow/controlled release fertilizers on yield,quality of fresh maize and ammonia emissions[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2020,31(7):2422-2430.
Authors:AN Wen-bo  SUN Yan-xin  LI Zhan-tai  WANG Ji-qing  ZOU Guo-yuan  YANG Jun-gang
Institution:1.New Fertilizer Research and Application Innovation Team, Institute of Plant Nutrition and Resources, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China;2.College of Agriculture and Forestry, Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China;3.Beijing Engineering Technology Research Center for Slow, Controlled-release Fertili-zer, Beijing 100097, China
Abstract:A field experiment with five treatments, control (CK, no fertilizer), conventional fertilization (U), double-effect inhibitor synergistic urea (DU), coated urea (CU) and slow/controlled release urea mixture (CDU), was conducted to investigate the effects of conventional fertilization (240 kg N·hm-2) and one-off application of different slow/controlled release fertilizers (180 kg N·hm-2) on the yield and quality of fresh maize, soil inorganic nitrogen (N), and ammonia (NH3) emissions. The results showed that the total amount of ammonia volatilization was the highest in treatment of conventional fertilization (U), with N topdressing being an important source of NH3 emission. Compared with U treatment, the NH3 volatilization in the DU, CU, and CDU treatments was reduced by 78%-81%. At harvest stage, the soil layer of 80-100 cm in the U treatment had the highest nitrate concentration (51.6 mg·kg-1), resulting in a high risk of N leaching. In contrast, the nitrate concentrations in the same soil layer in the slow/controlled release fertilizer treatments were much lower, reducing the risk of leaching. In comparison with U, three slow/controlled release fertilizer treatments with 25% lower N application did not decrease yield but increased seed Vc, soluble sugar and protein contents. The agronomic efficiency and economic benefit of DU treatment were the highest among three slow/controlled release fertilizers treatments. In conclusion, the application of new type of slow/controlled release fertilizer could improve the yield and quality of fresh maize, and significantly reduce the risk of ammonia loss and N leaching. Considering the higher cost of the polymer coated urea, the double-effect inhibitor urea has lower cost and is more convenient to make. It is therefore a better choice to fresh maize planting.
Keywords:fresh maize  coated urea  synergistic urea  ammonia volatilization  reduced fertilization  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号