首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

渭北旱塬农田不同耕作模式对土壤性状、玉米产量和水分利用效率的影响
引用本文:刘丹,张霞,李军,王旭东.渭北旱塬农田不同耕作模式对土壤性状、玉米产量和水分利用效率的影响[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(2):573-582.
作者姓名:刘丹  张霞  李军  王旭东
作者单位:1.西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;2.西北农林科技大学农学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;3.农业部西北植物营养与农业环境重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100
基金项目:本文由农业部公益性行业科研专项(201503116)资助
摘    要:通过渭北旱塬黑垆土8年定位试验,研究了秸秆还田下6种耕作方式,即连年翻耕(CT/CT)、免耕(NT/NT)、深松(ST/ST)和免耕/深松(NT/ST)、翻耕/免耕(CT/NT)、翻耕/深松(CT/ST)对土壤团聚体、有机碳、作物产量和水分利用效率(WUE)的影响.结果表明:与CT/CT相比,NT/NT、ST/ST及3种轮耕措施减小了土壤力稳性团聚体的平均质量直径;NT/NT、ST/ST和NT/ST措施增加了20~50 cm土层>0.25 mm水稳性团聚体的含量(WR0.25)和平均质量直径,降低了土壤团聚体结构破坏率(PAD).在0~10 cm土层,NT/ST、CT/NT、NT/NT和ST/ST处理土壤有机碳含量显著高于CT/CT处理.随着土层加深,各耕作处理土壤有机碳含量下降,但3种单一耕作处理(ST/ST、NT/NT和CT/CT)下降幅度大于3种轮耕处理(CT/NT、ST/CT和NT/ST).与CT/CT相比,其他5种耕作方式均增加了农田0~200 cm土层的土壤蓄水量、作物产量和水分利用效率,其中,NT/ST处理作物产量和WUE分别显著提高了15.1%和27.5%.相关分析表明,玉米产量、WUE与0~200 cm土层生育期和休闲期的蓄水量呈显著正相关,且生育期蓄水量与0~50 cm土层的WR0.25呈显著正相关,与PAD呈显著负相关;其中,20~50 cm土层的WR0.25、PAD与玉米产量、生育期蓄水量以及WUE关系最密切;生育期蓄水量和WUE还与0~10 cm土层的有机碳含量呈显著正相关.综合考虑不同耕作措施对土壤结构、作物产量和水分利用效率的影响,免耕/深松是最适宜于渭北旱塬区黑垆土春玉米种植的耕作方式.

收稿时间:2017-04-07

Effects of different tillage patterns on soil properties,maize yield and water use efficiency in Weibei Highland,China.
LIU Dan,ZHANG Xia,LI Jun,WANG Xu-dong.Effects of different tillage patterns on soil properties,maize yield and water use efficiency in Weibei Highland,China.[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2018,29(2):573-582.
Authors:LIU Dan  ZHANG Xia  LI Jun  WANG Xu-dong
Institution:1.College of Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;2.College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;3.Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and the Agri-environment in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
Abstract:An eight-year field experiment of straw returning was conducted on dark loessial soil in Weibei Highland to investigate the effects of tillage patterns on soil aggregate, soil organic carbon (SOC), corn yield and soil water use efficiency (WUE). There were six tillage patterns, including conventional tillage (CT/CT), no-tillage (NT/NT), subsoiling tillage (ST/ST), no-tillage/subsoiling tillage (NT/ST), conventional tillage/no-tillage (CT/NT) and conventional tillage/subsoiling tillage (CT/ST). The results showed that compared with CT/CT, the patterns of NT/NT, ST/ST and the rotational tillage patterns (NT/ST, CT/NT and CT/ST) decreased the mean mass diameter of soil mechanical stable aggregate. The patterns of NT/NT, ST/ST and NT/ST increased the content of soil water-stable aggregate with the particle size >0.25 mm (WR0.25) and their mean mass diameter, especially in the depth of 20-50 cm. These patterns reduced the proportion of aggregate destruction (PAD). Compared with CT/CT, the patterns of NT/ST, CT/NT, NT/NT and ST/ST increased the content of SOC in 0-10 cm soil layer. The content of SOC decreased as the increases of soil depth for all tillage patterns, but the decrease in SOC of three single tillage patterns (ST/ST, NT/NT and CT/CT) was larger than that of three rotational tillage patterns. Compared with CT/CT, the other five tillage patterns increased soil water storage in 0-200 cm soil profile, crop yield and WUE in maize. The yield and WUE in NT/ST pattern were significantly increased by 15.1% and 27.5%, respectively. Both corn yield and WUE were significantly and positively correlated with soil water storage in 0-200 cm soil profile in field during the cropping and fallow periods. Moreover, soil water storage during the cropping period was positively correlated with WR0.25, but negatively correlated with PAD in 0-50 cm soil layer. Particularly, maize yield, WUE and soil water storage during the cropping period were closely related to WR0.25 in 20-50 cm soil layer and PAD. Both WUE and soil water storage during the cropping period was correlated with the SOC content in 0-10 cm soil layer. With respect to the soil properties, crop yield and WUE, the tillage pattern of NT/ST was the best stratety in dark loessial soil for spring maize growth in Weibei Highland.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号