首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

广东鹤山人工林群落主要优势植物的热值和灰分含量
引用本文:曾小平,蔡锡安,赵平,饶兴权.广东鹤山人工林群落主要优势植物的热值和灰分含量[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(3):485-492.
作者姓名:曾小平  蔡锡安  赵平  饶兴权
作者单位:中国科学院华南植物园,广州,510650
基金项目:国家自然科学基金,广东省自然科学基金,中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目,中国科学院华南植物园博士启动项目,中国生态系统研究网络长期监测与示范项目 
摘    要:从广东鹤山南亚热带丘陵5种人工林群落中采集20种主要植物器官及3种群落凋落叶样品,利用PARR-1281氧弹热量计和马福炉分别测定样品的干质量热值和灰分含量,再计算去灰分热值;按器官、个体和生长型等比较分析植物的热值和灰分特征.结果表明:植物各器官的干质量热值、去灰分热值分别在10.7~22.17和13.89~23.04 kJ·g-1之间,叶片的干质量热值和去灰分热值明显高于其他器官(P<0.05).个体加权平均干质量热值和去灰分热值分别在14.24~19.43和16.63~20.99 kJ·g-1群落各层次植物去灰分热值平均值的高低依次为:乔木(19.55 kJ·g-1)>灌木(19.46 kJ·g-1)>草本(18.77 kJ·g-1),其中,乔木层树木的去灰分热值平均值大小为:本地针叶树(19.86 kJ·g-1)>本地阔叶树(19.55 kJ·g-1)>外来桉树(19.18 kJ·g-1),灰分含量的排序则相反.马占相思林、针叶林和木荷林群落的凋落叶热值均高于所在林分各层次的热值(P<0.01),马占相思林和针叶林的凋落叶热值大于所在乔木层叶片的热值,而木荷林凋落叶热值小于乔木层叶片的热值.

关 键 词:热值  灰分  人工林群落  生长型  鹤山
收稿时间:2008-7-14

Caloric value and ash content of dominant plants in plantation communities in Heshan of Guangdong, China.
ZENG Xiao-ping,CAI Xi-an,ZHAO Ping,RAO Xing-quan.Caloric value and ash content of dominant plants in plantation communities in Heshan of Guangdong, China.[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2009,20(3):485-492.
Authors:ZENG Xiao-ping  CAI Xi-an  ZHAO Ping  RAO Xing-quan
Institution:South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
Abstract:Different parts of twenty dominant plant species in five plantation communities on the subtropical hilly lands in Heshan of Gunagdong as well as the li tters from three of the five plantation communities were sampled, and their gros s caloric value (GCV) and ash content were measured by using a PARR-12 81 oxygen bomb calorimeter and a muffle furnace. Based on the measurements, the ash-free caloric value (AFCV) of the samples was calculated, and the characteri stics of caloric value and ash content of the samples, according to plant part, individual, and plant growth form, were analyzed. The results showed that the GC V and AFCV of leaf, branch, stem wood, stem bark, and root were in the range of 107〖KG-*2〗-〖KG-*7〗2217 kJ·g-1 and 1389〖KG-*2〗-〖KG-*7〗2304 kJ·g-1, respectively. The GCV and AFCV of leaf were significantly higher than those of other parts (P<005), and the individual plant’s weighted m ean values of GCV and AFCV were in the range of 1424〖KG-*2〗-〖KG-*7〗194 3 and 1663〖KG-*2〗-〖KG-*7〗2099 kJ·g-1, respectively. The mean AFCV of plantation communities was in the order of tree layer (1955 kJ·g-1) >shrub layer (1946 kJ·g-1)>herb layer (1877 kJ·g-1), with indigenous coniferous tree (1986 kJ·g-1)>indigenous broad-leaved tre e (1955 kJ·g-1) > exotic eucalyptus (1918 kJ·g-1), while the m ean ash content was just the opposite. In Acacia mangium, coniferous, and  Schima plantation communities, the GCV and AFCV of litters were higher than those of various plant parts (P<001). The litter-falls in A. mangium and coniferous plantations had higher mean GCV and AFCV than the litters and fr esh leaves of tree layer, while the fresh leaves of tree layer in Schima plantat ion showed higher mean GCV and AFCV.
Keywords:
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号