首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

热带季节雨林林冠碳通量不同校正方法的比较分析
引用本文:张一平,窦军霞,孙晓敏,赵双菊,宋清海,于贵瑞.热带季节雨林林冠碳通量不同校正方法的比较分析[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(12):2253-2258.
作者姓名:张一平  窦军霞  孙晓敏  赵双菊  宋清海  于贵瑞
作者单位:1. 中国科学院西双版纳热带植物园,昆明,650223
2. 中国科学院西双版纳热带植物园,昆明,650223;中国科学院生态环境研究中心,北京,100085;中国科学院研究生院,北京,100039
3. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京,100101
4. 中国科学院西双版纳热带植物园,昆明,650223;中国科学院研究生院,北京,100039
基金项目:国家基础研究发展规划项目(2002CB412501),中国科学院知识创新工程重大资助项目(KZCX1-SW-01-01A4).
摘    要:利用西双版纳热带季节雨林2003年3月1~9日的CO2和水汽通量数据,比较了不同校正方法的差异.结果表明,对季节雨林林冠碳通量观测数据进行校正是必要的,但不同校正方法所起的作用有所差异;昼间WPL校正的作用最大,虚温校正的作用最小;t检验证明,经WPL修正后的碳通量值与基准值、无显著差异;聚类分析表明,进行自然风3次旋转校正有利于数值精度的提高.夜间是自然风旋转校正的贡献最大、虚温校正贡献最小;t检验表明,经过WPL修正和平面旋转校正及其组合得到的碳通量值与基准值均有显著差异;而经包含有自然风旋转校正处理后的碳通量值与基准值均无显著差异;聚类分析表明,经过自然风坐标旋转后,再进行WPL修正,有利于数值精度的提高.

关 键 词:碳通量  校正方法  热带季节雨林
文章编号:1001-9332(2005)12-2253-06
收稿时间:2004-12-29
修稿时间:2005-05-30

A comparison of various correction methods for calculating carbon flux above tropical seasonal rainforest
ZHANG Yiping,DOU Junxia,SUN Xiaomin,ZHAO Shuangju,SONG Qinghai,YU Guirui.A comparison of various correction methods for calculating carbon flux above tropical seasonal rainforest[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2005,16(12):2253-2258.
Authors:ZHANG Yiping  DOU Junxia  SUN Xiaomin  ZHAO Shuangju  SONG Qinghai  YU Guirui
Institution:1.Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanic Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China ;2.Research Centre for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China ; 3.Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China ; 4.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Abstract:In this paper, various correction methods were compared, based on the observation data of the CO2 and water fluxes above the canopy of a tropical seasonal rainforest in Xishuangbanna during 1 - 9 March, 2003. The results showed that it was necessary to correct the observation data when calculating the carbon flux, though various correction methods contributed differently to the results. For daytime data, WPL made the most important contribution, while sonic temperature correction did the least, t test indicated that no significant difference was found between the carbon fluxes corrected by WPL and the standard values. Cluster analysis showed that triple-rotation correction was helpful to improve the precision of the data. For nighttime data, it was the triple-rotation correc- tion that made the most important contribution, and sonic temperature correction also did the least. There existed significant differences between the carbon fluxes corrected by WPL, planar-fit correction and their combination and the standard values, while the differences between the carbon fluxes corrected by double-or triple-rotation and the standard values were not significant. Cluster analysis showed that the data corrected orderly by coordinate axes-rotated correction and WPL would be propitious to improve the precision. The results would provide a basis for calculating the fluxes within tropical rainforest in the future, and supply reference to the fluxes calculation for other areas.
Keywords:Carbon flux  Correction method  Tropical seasonal rainforest  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号