基于开发区规划环评的土地资源承载力评价

土地资源承载力评价是规划环境影响评价的重点,是决定规划是否可以实施的重要依据.基于地理信息系统技术的空间分析功能,选取高程、坡度、土地利用现状、距居民点距离、距主要交通道路距离和距环境敏感区距离作为敏感因子,综合评价了漳州招商局经济技术开发区生态敏感性程度及其空间分布状况,并将评价结果与用地布局规划图叠加进行生态适宜性分析.结果表明:研究区84.0％的居住用地、93.1％的工业用地、86.0％的交通用地和76.0％的其他建设用地处于非敏感区和一般敏感区,用地规划实施总体上对区域陆域生态环境造成的影响较小,规划区内土地资源可以满足规划用地需求.以生态用地为约束条件进行人口承载力评价的结果表明,高度敏感区和60％的中度敏感区可视为生态用地,开发区规划期内人口规模为24.0万,区域人均用地可达134.0 m2,该人口规划规模适宜,符合相关建设用地标准.

Evaluation of land resources carrying capacity of development zone based on planning environment impact assessment

Assessment of land resources carrying capacity is the key point of planning environment impact assessment and the main foundation to determine whether the planning could be implemented or not. With the help of the space analysis function of Geographic Information System, and selecting altitude, slope, land use type, distance from resident land, distance from main traffic roads, and distance from environmentally sensitive area as the sensitive factors, a comprehensive assessment on the ecological sensitivity and its spatial distribution in Zhangzhou Merchants Economic and Technological Development Zone, Fujian Province of East China was conducted, and the assessment results were combined with the planning land layout diagram for the ecological suitability analysis. In the Development Zone, 84.0% of resident land, 93.1% of industrial land, 86.0% of traffic land, and 76. 0% of other constructive lands in planning were located in insensitive and gently sensitive areas, and thus, the implement of the land use planning generally had little impact on the ecological environment, and the land resources in the planning area was able to meet the land use demand. The assessment of the population carrying capacity with ecological land as the limiting factor indicated that in considering the highly sensitive area and 60% of the moderately sensitive area as ecological land, the population within the Zone in the planning could reach 240000, and the available land area per capita could be 134.0 m2. Such a planned population scale is appropriate, according to the related standards of constructive land.