首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

热带季节雨林优势树种叶片和冠层尺度二氧化碳交换特征
引用本文:宋清海,张一平,于贵瑞,杨振,赵双菊,高举明,孙晓敏.热带季节雨林优势树种叶片和冠层尺度二氧化碳交换特征[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(4):723-728.
作者姓名:宋清海  张一平  于贵瑞  杨振  赵双菊  高举明  孙晓敏
作者单位:1. 中国科学院西双版纳热带植物园热带雨林生态系统定位研究站,云南勐腊,666303;中国科学院研究生院,北京,100039
2. 中国科学院西双版纳热带植物园热带雨林生态系统定位研究站,云南勐腊,666303
3. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京,100101
基金项目:国家自然科学基金 , 中国科学院知识创新工程项目 , 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划) , 中国科学院基金
摘    要:采用叶室法和涡度相关法分析了西双版纳热带季节雨林优势树种绒毛番龙眼和大叶白颜树冠层及其叶片在不同季节的CO2交换量,并拟合得到主要特征值.结果表明:以叶室法测得的两树种冠层最大净光合速率(Pmax A)为雨季>雨季末>雾凉季>干热季,叶片暗呼吸速率(Rd)为雨季>雨季末>干热季>雾凉季;以涡度相关法得到的两树种冠层最大净光合速率(Pmax B)为雨季>雨季末>雾凉季>干热季,而冠层呼吸速率(Re)则是雨季>干热季>雾凉季>雨季末.两种方法得到的不同季节植物冠层最大净光合速率相差0.9~2.0 μmol·m-2·s-1.

关 键 词:CO2交换  冠层  光合作用  呼吸速率  热带季节雨林  西双版纳  热带  季节雨林  优势树种  植物冠层  尺度  氧化  碳交换  特征值  Xishuangbanna  forest  rain  seasonal  levels  canopy  leaf  exchange  方法  呼吸速率  干热  雨季
文章编号:1001-9332(2008)04-0723-06
收稿时间:2007-09-07
修稿时间:2007年9月7日

Characteristics of CO2 exchange at leaf and canopy levels in tropical seasonal rain forest of Xishuangbanna.
SONG Qing-hai,ZHANG Yi-ping,YU Gui-rui,YANG Zhen,ZHAO Shuang-ju,GAO Ju-ming,SUN Xiao-min.Characteristics of CO2 exchange at leaf and canopy levels in tropical seasonal rain forest of Xishuangbanna.[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2008,19(4):723-728.
Authors:SONG Qing-hai  ZHANG Yi-ping  YU Gui-rui  YANG Zhen  ZHAO Shuang-ju  GAO Ju-ming  SUN Xiao-min
Institution:Xishuangbanna Tropical Rainforest Ecosystem Station, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, Yunnan, China. sqh@xtbg.ac.cn
Abstract:By the methods of chamber-based and eddy covariance measurements, the CO2 exchange of dominant tree species Pometia tomentosa and Gironniera subaequalis at leaf and canopy levels in the tropical seasonal rain forest of Xishuangbanna was measured in different seasons of 2004. The results showed that for the two tree species, the maximum net photosynthesis (P(max A)) of canopy based on chamber-based measurement ranked in the order of rainy season (RS) > end of rainy season (ERS) > foggy-cool season (FS) > dry-hot season (DS), and the dark respiration rate (Rd) of leaf was RS > ERS > DS > FS. The P(max B) based on eddy covariance measurement was in the same order as that based on chamber-based measurement, while the canopy respiration rate (Re) was RS > DS > FS > ERS. The maximum net photosynthetic rate of canopy in different seasons measured by the two methods had a comparatively small difference, ranging from 0.9 to 2.0 micromol m(-2) s(-1).
Keywords:
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号