首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

基塘农业生态工程模式的能值评估
引用本文:陆宏芳,彭少麟,蓝盛芳,陈飞鹏.基塘农业生态工程模式的能值评估[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(10):1622-1626.
作者姓名:陆宏芳  彭少麟  蓝盛芳  陈飞鹏
作者单位:[1]中国科学院华南植物研究所,广州510650 [2]华南农业大学生物技术学院,广州510642
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(30070146,30170147,30270282)
摘    要:应用能值分析方法及最新推出的评价系统可持续发展能力的能值指标(EISD),分别对珠江三角洲三水市的3种基塘农业生态工程模式进行了系统层和子系统层的能值比较研究。结果表明,模Ⅲ的可持续发展性能最强,其EISD比模式Ⅰ、Ⅱ分别高出58.3%和29.7%;种植业子系统经济效益好,但环境压力大。是模式内可持续发展性最差的子系统;畜牧业子系统生产环效果不佳,但增益环效果明显;渔业子系统经济效益好,环境压力小。是系统内可持续发展性最强的子系统。引入翘嘴鳜的生态经济边际效益显著。

关 键 词:水稻  氮高效利用基因型  分配  转运  氮素转运效率  
文章编号:1001-9332(2003)10-1622-05
修稿时间:2001年11月7日

Energy value evaluation of dike-pond agro-ecological engineering modes
LU Hongfang,PENG Shaolin,LAN Shengfang,CHEN Feipeng.Energy value evaluation of dike-pond agro-ecological engineering modes[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2003,14(10):1622-1626.
Authors:LU Hongfang  PENG Shaolin  LAN Shengfang  CHEN Feipeng
Institution:South China Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China. luhf@scib.ac.cn
Abstract:In this paper, energy value analysis and new energy index for sustainable development (EISD) were used to evaluate three different dike-pond agro-ecological engineering modes in Sanshui city of Pearl River Delta in system and subsystem levels. The result showed that mode III was the best in its sustainable development ability. The EISD of mode III was 58.3% and 29.7% higher than that of modes I and II. With a higher economic benefit and higher environmental loading, the planting subsystem had the lowest sustainability. Although the economic benefit of stock raising subsystem was not high, its indirect benefit was higher. With a higher economic benefit and a lower environmental loading, fishing subsystem had the highest sustainability.
Keywords:Dike-pond modes  Agro-ecological engineering  Energy value  Sustainable development ability  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号