| 生态系统服务的物质量与价值量评价方法的比较分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 赵景柱,肖寒,吴刚.生态系统服务的物质量与价值量评价方法的比较分析[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(2):290-292. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 赵景柱 肖寒 吴刚 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国科学院生态环境研究中心系统生态开放研究室,北京,100085 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金资助项目!(39770149) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对生态系统服务的物质量评价和价值量评价这两类评价方法进行比较，分析了这两类评价方法的优点和缺点，结果表明，采用物质量和价值量两种不同的方法对同一生态系统进行服务评价，往往会得出不同甚至相反的结论：对于不同的评价目的和不同的评价空间尺度，这两类评价方法的作用是有较大区别的，同时这两类评价方法在一定意义上又是相互促进和互为补充的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 生态系统服务 物质量评价 价值量评价 |
| 修稿时间： | 1999-12-09 |
Comparison analysis on physical and value assessment methods for ecosystems services |
| |
| ZHAO Jingzhu,XIAO Han,WU Gang.Comparison analysis on physical and value assessment methods for ecosystems services[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2000,11(2):290-292. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHAO Jingzhu XIAO Han WU Gang |
| |
| Institution: | Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085. jzhao@mail.rcees.ac.cn |
| |
| Abstract: | Physical assessment method (PAM) and value assessment method (VAM) for ecosystems services assessment were compared, and their strengths and weaknesses were analyzed. The comparison and analysis demonstrated that in some cases,different, even opposite results will be drawn with these two methods for the ecosystems services assessment of one ecosystem. The functions or effects of PAM and VAM are different for different assessment purposes or different spatial scales, but they will promote and complement each other to some extent. |
| |
| Keywords: | Ecosystems services Assessment Comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
