首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

六盘山南坡不同密度华北落叶松水源林生长过程比较
引用本文:王晶,莫菲,段文标,于澎涛,熊伟,王彦辉,王占印,曹恭祥.六盘山南坡不同密度华北落叶松水源林生长过程比较[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(3):500-506.
作者姓名:王晶  莫菲  段文标  于澎涛  熊伟  王彦辉  王占印  曹恭祥
作者单位:1. 东北林业大学林学院,哈尔滨,150040
2. 中国林业科学研究院森林生态与环境保护研究所国家林业局森林生态环境重点实验室,北京,100091
3. 内蒙古农业大学生态环境学院,呼和浩特,010019
基金项目:国家自然科学基金,国家科技支撑计划,科技部水利部公益性行业科研专项基金,国家林业局技术引进项目,国家林业局森林生态环境重点实验室资助项目 
摘    要:以六盘山南侧的华北落叶松水源涵养林为研究对象,利用标准木树干解析法,研究了21年生低、中、高3种密度(1200、1500和2000 株·hm-2)华北落叶松人工林的生长过程和直径结构.结果表明:华北落叶松3种密度林分在10年生前各项生长指标差异不显著;10年生后的林木直径、单株材积和林分蓄积生长过程明显不同;21年生时,低密度林分的生长状况明显优于中、高密度林分,但树高生长受密度影响不显著;3种密度林分直径分布的偏度系数(Sk)差异较大,高密度林分的Sk(0.338)大于中密度(0.072)和低密度林分(0.015).前者直径分布偏离正态分布,呈现顶峰偏左的现象;后者的直径分布接近正态分布,密度结构较合理;中密度林分直径分布的峰度系数(K,1.691)大于高密度(1.532)和低密度林分(0.665).说明中密度林分的林木分化程度比高、低密度林分小;林龄为21年的华北落叶松人工林的合理保留密度应为1200 株·hm-2.

关 键 词:六盘山  华北落叶松  林木生长量  林分密度  直径结构
收稿时间:2008-9-9

Growth process of Larix principis-rupprechtii stands with different density on south slope of Liupan Mountains.
WANG Jing,MO Fei,DUAN Wen-biao,YU Peng-tao,XIONG Wei,WANG Yan-hui,WANG Zhan-yin,CAO Gong-xiang.Growth process of Larix principis-rupprechtii stands with different density on south slope of Liupan Mountains.[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2009,20(3):500-506.
Authors:WANG Jing  MO Fei  DUAN Wen-biao  YU Peng-tao  XIONG Wei  WANG Yan-hui  WANG Zhan-yin  CAO Gong-xiang
Institution:College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China;State Forestry Administration Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment, Research Institute of Forestry Ecology and Environment, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China;College of Ecoenvironment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China
Abstract:By the method of sample trees stem analysis, this paper studied the growth process and diameter structure of 21-year-old Larix principis-rupprechtii plantations with the densities of 1200, 1500, and 2000 stems·hm-2 in the head-water area on the southern slope of Liupan Mountain in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. The results showed that there were no significant differences in the growth status of L. principis-rupprechtii stands among the three densities when the stand age was less than 10 years. However, obvious differences were observed in the diameter and timber volume of individual trees and in the stand volume when the stand age was more than 10 years. The tree growth status in low-density stand was apparently better than that in medium- and high-density stands, but the height growth had no significant difference among the three densities. There was a significant difference in the skewness coefficient (Sk) of diameter distribution among the stands with different density, being higher (Sk=0338) in high-density stand than in medium-density stand (Sk=0072) and low-density stand (Sk=0015). The diameter distribution in high-density stand deviated from normal distribution, with a zenith tending to left, while that in medium- and low-density stands approached a normal distribution, with a more reasonable density structure. The kurtosis coefficient (K=1691) of medium-density stand was higher than that of high-density stand (K=1532) and low-density stand (K=0665), indicating a lower degree of polarization of tree growth in medium-density stand than in other two stands. The reasonable remaining density of 21-year-old L. principis-rupprechtii plantations was suggested to be 1200 stems·hm-2.
Keywords:
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号