首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

基于植被指数的典型草原区生物量模型——以内蒙古锡林浩特市为例
引用本文:李素英,李晓兵,莺歌,符娜.基于植被指数的典型草原区生物量模型——以内蒙古锡林浩特市为例[J].植物生态学报,2007,31(1):23-31.
作者姓名:李素英  李晓兵  莺歌  符娜
作者单位:北京师范大学资源学院, 北京师范大学环境演变与自然灾害教育部重点实验室, 北京 100875
基金项目:国家自然科学基金;教育部跨世纪优秀人才培养计划
摘    要: 利用遥感估测地上生物量是国内外生态学与地理学的研究热点。但基于植被指数的生物量回归模型结果差异较大,究竟哪种植被指数与哪种模 型更适合典型草原的生物量反演,是现代草地遥感急需解决的问题之一。该文基于TM影像数据的不同植被指数(VI)差异性,分别选取了RVI(比 值植被指数)、NDVI(归一化差异植被指数)、SAVI(土壤调节植被指数)、MASVI(修改型土壤调整植被指数)和RSR(简化比率植被指数)5种植被指 数,与同期的内蒙古典型草原区地面实测地上生物量做相关分析,分别建立了5种植被指数与地上生物量的线性及3种非线性(对数、二次多项式 、三次多项式)回归模型。研究结果表明:对于中国北方典型草原区而言,地上生物量与5种植被指数(RVI、NDVI、SAVI、MSAVI和RSR)均呈现出 显著相关,但地上生物量与后4种植被指数是正相关,与RVI为负相关;利用5种植被指数(RVI、NDVI、SAVI、MSAVI和RSR)监测草地植被生物量 的复相关系数均大于0.6,充分说明利用植被指数检测典型草原生物量是一种简单可行的方法;NDVI建立的生物量回归模型,其复相关系数大于 其它4类植被指数(RVI、SAVI、MSAVI和RSR),说明NDVI-生物量模型优于植被指数RVI、SAVI、MSAVI和RSR模型,其模拟地表生物量的效果好; 对于TM影像来说,植被生物量的线性模型与3种非线性模型(三次多项式生物量模型、二次多项式生物量模型、对数模型)都表现出较好的模拟效 果,都通过了0.01的显著性检验,而且该研究的结果显示出三次多项式生物量回归模型最优,其次是二次多项式生物量模型,再次是线性模型 ,相对较差的是对数模型。通过NDVI-生物量三次多项式回归模型模拟锡林浩特草原的生物量,可以看出整个研究区的地上生物量基本上是东高 西低、东南高西北低的趋势,这与研究区的地形、气候及土地利用等多种因素有关。

关 键 词:植被指数  典型草原  地上生物量  回归模型
修稿时间:2006-05-09

VEGETATION INDEXES-BIOMASS MODELS FOR TYPICAL SEMI-ARID STEPPE-A CASE STUDY FOR XILINHOT IN NORTHERN CHINA
LI Su-Ying,LI Xiao-Bing,YING Ge,FU Na.VEGETATION INDEXES-BIOMASS MODELS FOR TYPICAL SEMI-ARID STEPPE-A CASE STUDY FOR XILINHOT IN NORTHERN CHINA[J].Acta Phytoecologica Sinica,2007,31(1):23-31.
Authors:LI Su-Ying  LI Xiao-Bing  YING Ge  FU Na
Institution:College of Resources Sciences and Technology, Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster of the Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Abstract:Aims There is a crucial need in grassland study for a vegetation index (VI)-biomass model simulating steppe biomass based on remote sensing. Methods Thematic mapper (TM) images (spatial resolution of 30 m× 30 m) for the research area in 2005 and 1991 were rectified so that geometric errors were less than one pixel, then extracted the image of the research region in the soft of ERDAS. We used five vegetation indexes: RVI(ratio vegetation index), NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index), SAVI (soil-adjusted vegetation index),MASVI (modified soil-adjusted vegetation index) and RSR (reduced simple ratio index). They were correlated to plant biomass sampled on the ground at the same time as the TM images. We developed four kinds of regression models: linear, logarithm, second-degree polynomial and cubic polynomial. Important findings The correlations between sampled biomass and the five VIs were highly significant, with four (NDVI, SAVI, MSAVI, RSR) being positive and one (RVI) negative. Multiple correlation coefficients (R 2) of the 15 regression models were >0.6, indicating that a VI-biomass regression model was a simple method to monitor the biomass of steppe grassland. The R 2 of the NDVI-biomass model was the highest, indicating that it was better suited to simulate the biomass of typical steppe than the other VIs. For TM image, all four kinds of models were significant at the 0.01 level, with the cubic polynomial model as the best to simulate the biomass, followed by the second-degree polynomial, linear and logarithm models. Therefore, the cubic polynomial regression model based on NDVI-biomass was the best model, and was used to simulate the biomass of the research region. Simulated biomass was higher in the east than in the west of the research region and higher in the southeast than in the northwest. Simulated biomass was consistent with sampled biomass in 2005.
Keywords:vegetation index  typical steppe  biomass  regression model
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《植物生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《植物生态学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号