首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

红外相机技术与其他几种森林鸟类多样性调查方法的比较
引用本文:张倩雯,龚粤宁,宋相金,王新财,杨昌腾,束祖飞,邹发生.红外相机技术与其他几种森林鸟类多样性调查方法的比较[J].生物多样性,2018,26(3):229-229.
作者姓名:张倩雯  龚粤宁  宋相金  王新财  杨昌腾  束祖飞  邹发生
作者单位:1 (中国科学院华南植物园, 广州 510650)
2 (中国科学院大学, 北京 100049)
3 (广东省生物资源应用研究所, 广东省动物保护与资源利用重点实验室, 广东省野生动物保护与利用公共实验室, 广州 510260)
4 (广东南岭国家级自然保护区管理局, 广东乳源 512727)
5 (广东车八岭国家级自然保护区管理局, 广东始兴 512528)
基金项目:广东省科学院科研平台环境与能力建设专项(2016GDASPT-0305)、广东省科学院野外台站项目(Sytz 201506, Sytz 201514)和广东省自然保护区专项资金项目(GDHS15SGFX07060, RYCG12-14)
摘    要:为了探讨红外相机技术、网捕法、固定距离样线法和固定半径样点法对森林鸟类多样性调查的有效性和实用性, 我们于2011-2016年, 用这几种方法调查了广东南岭国家级自然保护区和车八岭国家级自然保护区的鸟类多样性。在南岭, 固定距离样线法和固定半径样点法记录鸟类222种, 网捕鸟类43种, 红外相机拍到鸟类47种; 其中1种鸟仅网捕到, 6种鸟仅被红外相机拍到, 164种鸟仅被固定距离样线法和固定半径样点法记录到。在车八岭, 固定距离样线法和固定半径样点法记录鸟类109种, 网捕鸟类42种, 红外相机拍到鸟类27种, 其中9种鸟仅网捕到, 3种鸟仅被红外相机拍到, 97种鸟仅被固定距离样线法和固定半径样点法记录到。随着鸟类的体重、体长、翅长和跗蹠增加, 网捕到的鸟类个体数量减少, 鸟类身体大小与网捕到的鸟类数量呈显著负相关; 而红外相机拍到的鸟类数量随鸟类的身体大小增大而增加, 并且呈显著的正相关。本文的结果显示, 网捕法和红外相机技术针对不同类群的鸟类调查效力不同, 但都是固定距离样线法和固定半径样点法的有效补充。建议今后开展森林鸟类多样性调查与监测时, 尽量采用多种研究方法相结合, 以求达到最优的效果。

关 键 词:鸟类多样性  红外相机技术  网捕法  固定距离样线法  固定半径样点法  生物多样性监测  
收稿时间:2017-10-21

Comparing the effectiveness of camera trapping to traditional methods for biodiversity surveys of forest birds
Zhang Qianwen,Gong Yuening,Song Xiangjin,Wang Xincai,Yang Changteng,Shu Zufei,Zou Fasheng.Comparing the effectiveness of camera trapping to traditional methods for biodiversity surveys of forest birds[J].Biodiversity Science,2018,26(3):229-229.
Authors:Zhang Qianwen  Gong Yuening  Song Xiangjin  Wang Xincai  Yang Changteng  Shu Zufei  Zou Fasheng
Abstract:To compare the effectiveness of camera trapping to more common mist netting, fixed-distance line transect, and fixed-radius point count methods of forest birds, we surveyed bird species diversity at Nanling National Nature Reserve and Chebaling National Nature Reserve, Guangdong, China from 2011 to 2016. At Nanling, 222 bird species were recorded by fixed-distance line transect and fixed-radius point count methods, 43 bird species were captured by mist netting and 47 bird species were trapped by cameras. One species was captured only by mist netting, six species only by camera-trapping, and 164 species only by fixed-distance line transect and fixed-radius point count methods. At Chebaling, 109 bird species were recorded by fixed-distance line transect and fixed-radius point count methods, 42 by mist nets and 27 by cameras. Nine species were recorded only by mist netting, three only by camera-trapping, and 97 only by fixed-distance line transect and fixed-radius point count methods. At both sites, the number of birds captured by mist netting was negatively correlated with increasing body size, whether measured as body weight, body length, wing length, or tarsus length. By contrast, the number of birds photographed by camera traps was positively correlated with the same measures of body size. These results show that bird surveys using different methods may yield different results and that method should be selected to suit the body size of the target bird species. In surveying bird diversity of a wide range of body sizes, mist netting and camera trapping together would be complimentary methods. Our results suggest that a combination of research methods may be necessary to obtain reliable avian diversity estimates.
Keywords:avian diversity  camera trapping  mist netting  fixed-distance line transect  fixed-radius point count  biodiversity monitoring  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《生物多样性》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生物多样性》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号