首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Comparative study of Bifidobacteriumanimalis, Escherichiacoli, Lactobacilluscasei and Saccharomycesboulardii probiotic properties
Authors:Flaviano S Martins  Aparecida A Silva  Angélica T Vieira  Flávio H F Barbosa  Rosa M E Arantes  Mauro M Teixeira and Jacques Robert Nicoli
Institution:(1) Departamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ci?ncias Biol?gicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, C.P. 486, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30161-970, Brazil;(2) Departamento de Bioqu?mica e Imunologia, Instituto de Ci?ncias Biol?gicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil;(3) Departamento de Patologia Geral, Instituto de Ci?ncias Biol?gicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil;(4) Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica de Minas Gerais (PUC-Minas), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil;
Abstract:The present work investigates some probiotic properties of four different microorganisms (Bifidobacterium animalis var. lactis BB-12, Escherichia coli EMO, Lactobacillus casei and Saccharomyces boulardii). In vitro and in vivo tests were carried out to compare cell wall hydrophobicity, production of antagonistic substances, survival capacity in the gastrointestinal tract of germ-free mice without pathological consequence, and immune modulation by stimulation of Küpffer cells, intestinal sIgA and IL-10 levels. In vitro antagonism against pathogenic bacteria and yeast was only observed for the probiotic bacteria B. animalis and L. casei. The hydrophobic property of the cell wall was higher for B. animalis and E. coli EMO, and this property could be responsible for a better ability to colonize the gastrointestinal tract of germ-free mice. Higher levels of sIgA were observed mainly for S. boulardii, followed by E. coli EMO and B. animalis, and only S. boulardii induced a significant higher level of IL-10. In conclusion, for a probiotic use, S. boulardii presented better characteristics in terms of immunomodulation, and B. animalis and L. casei for antagonistic substance production. The knowledge of the different probiotic properties could be used to choice the better microorganism depending on the therapeutic or prophylactic application.
Keywords:Probiotic            Lactobacillus casei                      Bifidobacterium animalis var  lactis BB-12            Escherichia coli EMO            Saccharomyces boulardii            sIgA  IL-10
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号