首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Nickel Carcinogenicity in Relation to the Health Risks from Residual Oil Fly Ash
Authors:Christopher M Teaf  Bruce J Tuovila  Edward J Zillioux  Annette Shipp  Greg Lawrence  Cynthia Van Landingham
Institution:1. Center for Biomedical &2. Toxicological Research, Florida State University , Tallahassee, Florida, USA;3. Hazardous Substance &4. Waste Management Research, Inc. , Tallahassee, Florida, USA;5. FPL Environmental Services , Juno Beach, Florida, USA;6. ENVIRON , Ruston, Louisiana, USA
Abstract:Epidemiological studies of workers in the nickel industry, animal exposure studies, and reports on the potential mechanisms of nickel-induced toxicity and carcinogenicity indicate that only crystalline sulfidic nickel compounds have been clearly established as carcinogenic or potentially carcinogenic in humans. This observation indicates the need to modify and update regulatory approaches for nickel to reflect noncancer toxicity values for some individual nickel species. Analysis of nickel compounds in residual oil fly ash (ROFA) indicates that sulfidic nickel compounds (e.g., nickel subsulfide, nickel sulfide) are not present. Thus, the potential for emission of carcinogenic nickel compounds from residual oil fly ash appears to be low. Preliminary reference concentrations (RfCs) for a number of nickel compounds, based on non-carcinogenic endpoints, are proposed on the basis of the benchmark dose approach in conjunction with NTP data for nickel species.
Keywords:nickel  residual oil fly ash  ROFA  cancer  reference concentration  RfC  benchmark dose  
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号