首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

盐碱旱地转Bt基因抗虫棉田主要害虫及其天敌种群消长动态
引用本文:雒珺瑜,张帅,吕丽敏,朱香镇,王春义,张利娟,王丽,李春花,崔金杰.盐碱旱地转Bt基因抗虫棉田主要害虫及其天敌种群消长动态[J].生物安全学报,2018,27(1):50-58.
作者姓名:雒珺瑜  张帅  吕丽敏  朱香镇  王春义  张利娟  王丽  李春花  崔金杰
作者单位:中国农业科学院棉花研究所/棉花生物学国家重点实验室, 河南 安阳 455000,中国农业科学院棉花研究所/棉花生物学国家重点实验室, 河南 安阳 455000,中国农业科学院棉花研究所/棉花生物学国家重点实验室, 河南 安阳 455000,中国农业科学院棉花研究所/棉花生物学国家重点实验室, 河南 安阳 455000,中国农业科学院棉花研究所/棉花生物学国家重点实验室, 河南 安阳 455000,中国农业科学院棉花研究所/棉花生物学国家重点实验室, 河南 安阳 455000,中国农业科学院棉花研究所/棉花生物学国家重点实验室, 河南 安阳 455000,中国农业科学院棉花研究所/棉花生物学国家重点实验室, 河南 安阳 455000,中国农业科学院棉花研究所/棉花生物学国家重点实验室, 河南 安阳 455000
基金项目:转基因棉花环境安全评价技术(2016ZX08011002)
摘    要:【目的】近年来,我国长江流域和黄河流域棉花面积锐减,种植区域向滨海盐碱地或干旱地转移。研究盐碱旱地转基因棉田与非转基因棉田昆虫群落差异,可为盐碱旱地对转基因棉田生物影响和盐碱旱地转基因棉田害虫防治提供理论指导。【方法】在山东东营和河北枣强盐碱干旱地转Bt基因棉田分别设置常规施药田和非施药田,进行了系统的田间昆虫种群消长动态的调查和统计分析。【结果】中轻度盐碱旱地种植转基因棉花对靶标害虫棉铃虫具有较好的控制作用;与非转基因棉花相比,对其他非靶标害虫棉蚜、烟粉虱和盲蝽及自然天敌龟纹瓢虫、草间小黑蛛种群数量无显著影响,草蛉种群数量在转基因棉田低于非转基因棉田;喷施化学农药对棉铃虫幼虫和棉蚜的防治作用较好,对烟粉虱和盲蝽的防治效果年度间和试验点间有差异,对龟纹瓢虫的杀伤力较大,对草间小黑蛛和草蛉未见明显影响。【结论】盐碱旱地对棉田不同的害虫和天敌影响不同,且转基因棉田与非转基因棉田昆虫群落结构与对照棉田无显著差异。

关 键 词:盐碱地  旱地  Bt基因棉花  害虫  天敌  种群动态
收稿时间:2017/6/27 0:00:00
修稿时间:2018/1/15 0:00:00

Population dynamics of the main pests and their natural enemies of Bt transgenic cotton field in saline alkali and drought land
LUO Junyu,ZHANG Shuai,L&#; Limin,ZHU Xiangzhen,WANG Chunyi,ZHANG Lijuan,WANG Li,LI Chunhua and CUI Jinjie.Population dynamics of the main pests and their natural enemies of Bt transgenic cotton field in saline alkali and drought land[J].Journal of Biosafety,2018,27(1):50-58.
Authors:LUO Junyu  ZHANG Shuai  L&#; Limin  ZHU Xiangzhen  WANG Chunyi  ZHANG Lijuan  WANG Li  LI Chunhua and CUI Jinjie
Institution:Institute of Cotton Research of CAAS/State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Anyang, Henan 455000, China,Institute of Cotton Research of CAAS/State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Anyang, Henan 455000, China,Institute of Cotton Research of CAAS/State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Anyang, Henan 455000, China,Institute of Cotton Research of CAAS/State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Anyang, Henan 455000, China,Institute of Cotton Research of CAAS/State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Anyang, Henan 455000, China,Institute of Cotton Research of CAAS/State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Anyang, Henan 455000, China,Institute of Cotton Research of CAAS/State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Anyang, Henan 455000, China,Institute of Cotton Research of CAAS/State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Anyang, Henan 455000, China and Institute of Cotton Research of CAAS/State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Anyang, Henan 455000, China
Abstract:Aim] The Yangtze River Basin and the Yellow River Basin have decreased sharply leading to cultivation of cotton on coastal saline or dry lands. The objective of this research was to compare the impacts of transgenic versus non-transgenic cotton cultivation on pest insect populations and the efficiency of pesticides for pest control.Method] The paper surveyed and analyzed the insect population dynamics in transgenic cotton fields in Dongying in Shandong Province, and Zaoqiang in Hebei Province, which were sprayed or not with pesticides in 2013 and 2014.Result] The transgenic cotton in saline alkaline and dry soil had better control effect on target pests than non-transgenic cotton. The populations of non-target pests such as Aphis gossypii, Bemisia tabaci and Miridae, and predators, such as Propylaea japonica and Erigonidium graminicolum, were not significantly different between the two types of cotton fields. The Chrysopa population was smaller in transgenic cotton fields than non-transgenic cotton fields. Chemical pesticides effectively controlled Helicoverpa armigera eggs, larvae of cotton bollworm and cotton aphids. The control of Bemisia tabaci and fleahopper differed among fields and yearly, with greater effects observed for Propylaea japonica.Conclusion] The effects of saline alkali drought land on different pests and natural enemies in cotton fields were different, and compared with the non-Bt cotton, the insect community structure of transgenic cotton fields in saline and dry land showed no difference.
Keywords:saline alkaline land  drought land  Bt cotton  pest  natural enemies  population dynamics
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《生物安全学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生物安全学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号