新式剖宫产术60 例临床分析

目的：通过临床观察比较，探讨新式剖宫产在临床上的应用。方法：随机选择孕妇120例，分为改良组（即新式剖宫产）（n=60）和对照组（即腹壁纵切口剖宫产）（n=60），观察两组的手术时间，术中出血、术后病率、术后镇痛药物的使用，排气时间以及住院天数等。结果：两组的术后病率无统计学差异（P〉0．05），而改良组的手术时间，术中出血量，术后镇痛药物的使用。排气时间以及住院天数较对照组短（P〈0．05），有显著性差异。结论：新式剖宫产操作简单，手术时间短，术中出血少，术后疼痛轻，恢复快，住院时间短。取得较好的手术效果。

Clinical Application of Improved Cesarean Section :Analysis of 60 Cases

Objective: To investigate the clinical application of improved cesarean section(ICS) through clinical observation and comparison. Methods: 120 unigravidas were randomly selected and divided into the improved group(i.e. ICS)(n=60) and control group(i.e. cesarean delivery of abdominal wall longitudinal incision, CDAWLI)(n=60). In the two groups, the clinical data of operative time, bleeding in operation,postoperative administration of pain-killer, exsufflation time, length of stay were observed. Results There was no statistical difference in postoperative disease rates of the two groups(P>0.05); but significant difference in the clinical data of the two groups(P<0.05). Conclusion: Compared with CDAWLI, ICS is easy to operate, which can acquire better effects of shorter operative time, less bleeding in operation, slightly postoperative pain, fast recovery and shorter length of stay.