首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Identification of molecular markers in soybean comparing RFLP,RAPD and AFLP DNA mapping techniques
Authors:Jhy-Jhu Lin  Jonathan Kuo  Jin Ma  James A Saunders  Hunter S Beard  Margaret H MacDonald  William Kenworthy  George N Ude  Benjamin F Matthews
Institution:(1) Life Technologies, Inc., 8717 Grovemont Circle, 20877 Gaithersburg, MD, USA;(2) Climate Stress Laboratory, USDA ARS, 20705 Beltsville, MD, USA;(3) Plant Molecular Biology Laboratory, USDA ARS, 20705 Beltsville, MD, USA;(4) Department of Agronomy, University of Maryland, 20742 College Park, MD, USA
Abstract:Three different DNA mapping techniques—RFLP, RAPD and AFLP—were used on identical soybean germplasm to compare their ability to identify markers in the development of a genetic linkage map. Polymorphisms present in fourteen different soybean cultivars were demonstrated using all three techniques. AFLP, a novel PCR-based technique, was able to identify multiple polymorphic bands in a denaturing gel using 60 of 64 primer pairs tested. AFLP relies on primers designed in part on sequences for endonuclease restriction sites and on three selective nucleotides. The 60 diagnostic primer pairs tested for AFLP analysis each distinguished on average six polymorphic bands. Using specific primers designed for soybean fromEco RI andMse I restriction site sequences and three selective nucleotides, as many as 12 polymorphic bands per primer could be obtained with AFLP techniques. Only 35% of the RAPD reactions identified a polymorphic band using the same soybean cultivars, and in those positive reactions, typically only one or two polymorphic bands per gel were found. Identification of polymorphic bands using RFLP techniques was the most cumbersome, because Southern blotting and probe hybridization were required. Over 50% of the soybean RFLP probes examined failed to distinguish even a single polymorphic band, and the RFLP probes that did distinguish polymorphic bands seldom identified more than one polymorphic band. We conclude that, among the three techniques tested, AFLP is the most useful.
Keywords:DNA fingerprinting            Glycine max            PCR
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号