The oxygen uptake-power regression in cyclists and untrained men: implications for the accumulated oxygen deficit

The regression of oxygen uptake (O₂) on power output and the O₂ demand predicted for suprapeak oxygen uptake (O_2peak) exercise (power output = 432 W) were compared in ten male cyclists C, mean O_2peak = 67.9 (SD 4.2) ml · kg^–1 · min^–1] and nine active, yet untrained men UT, mean O_2peak = 54.1 (SD 6.5) ml · kg^–1 · min^–1]. The O₂-power regression was determined using a continuous incremental cycle test (CON4), performed twice, which comprised several 4-min exercise periods progressing in intensity from approximately 40%–85% O_2peak. Minute ventilation (_E), heart rate (HR), respiratory exchange ratio (R), blood lactate concentration (1a^–]_b) and rectal temperature (T _re) were measured at rest and during CON4. The slope of the O₂-power regression was greater (P 0.05) in C 12.4 (SD 0.7) ml · min^–1. W^–1] compared to UT 11.7 (SD 0.4) ml · min^–1 W^–1]; as a result, the O₂ demand (at 432 W) was also higher (P 0.05) in C 5.97 (SD 0.23) l · min^–1] than UT 5.70 (SD 0.15) 1 · min^–1]. ExerciseR and la^–]_b were lower (P 0.05) in C .in comparison to UT at all power outputs, whereas _E and HR were relatively lower (P 0.05) in C at power outputs approximating 180 W, 220 W and 270 W. Differences in fat metabolism estimated over the first three power outputs accounted for approximately 19% of the difference in O₂-power slopes between the groups and up to 46% of the difference in O₂ at a given intensity. Although the O₂-power regressions were linear for C r = 0.997 (SD 0.001)] and UT r = 0.997 (SD 0.001)], the O₂-power slope was higher at power outputs at or above the lactate threshold (13.2 ml · min^–1 · W^–1 than at lower intensities (11.6 ml · min^–1 · W^–1) in C, an effect which was less profound in UT. As a result, the exclusion of O₂ at the highest power outputs completely abolished the difference in O₂-power slopes between C and UT. Thus, the relatively higher O₂ during incremental exercise in C can be almost entirely attributed to the higher O₂ cost of cycling at higher power outputs. In addition, the presence of non-linear responses in O₂ at higher intensities also confirms the invalidity of describing the O₂ response across a wide range of power outputs using a linear function, and challenges the validity of predicting the O₂ demand of more intense exercise by a linear extrapolation of this same function.