首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Preformed GroES Oligomers Are Not Required as Functional Cochaperonins
Authors:Jeffrey W Seale  John M Chirgwin  Borries Demeler and Paul M Horowitz
Institution:(1) Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78240-7760;(2) Present address: Mail Stop GG4D, Monsanto, 700 Chesterfield Parkway North, St. Louis, Missouri, 63198
Abstract:We have previously shown that the C-terminal sequence of GroES is required for oligomerization Seale and Horowitz (1995), J. Biol. Chem. 270, 30268–30270]. In this report, we have generated a C-terminal deletion mutant of GroES with a significantly destabilized oligomer and have investigated its function in the chaperonin-assisted protein folding cycle. Removal of the two C-terminal residues of GroES results in a cochaperonin GroESD(96–97)] that is monomeric at concentrations where GroES function is assessed. Using equilibrium ultracentrifugation, we measured the dissociation constant for the oligomer–monomer equilibrium to be 7.3×10–34M6. The GroESD(96–97) is fully active as a cochaperonin. This mutant is able to inhibit the ATPase activity of GroEL to levels comparable to wild-type GroES. It is also able to assist the refolding of urea-denatured rhodanese by GroEL. While GroESD(96–97) can function at levels comparable to wild-type GroES, higher concentrations of mutant are required to produce the same effect. These results support the idea that the preformed GroES heptamer is not required for function, but they suggest that the oligomeric cochaperonin is most efficient.
Keywords:Protein folding  chaperonins  GroES  GroEL  ATPase
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号