Mercury-biogeochemical exploration for mineral deposits

Biogeochemical prospecting for mercury deposits and deposits of other minerals by the chemical analysis of mercury in plants or plant tissue that accumulate this element in linear (or near linear) proportion to the concentration in the soil is an effective method of exploration, even where allochthonous material as much as 200 to 2000 m thick covers the deposits. Plant tissues with this tendency to accumulate mercury (designated as non-barrier to mercury) comprise only a small fraction of the total of 255 types of plant tissues that were tested. Ten of these were considered to be quantitatively informative, and their mercury concentrations exceeded background values 300 or more times. The remaining types of plant tissues ranged in prospecting value from semi-quantitatively informative to qualitatively informative to uniformative (mercury values at or below background). The failure of some earlier uses of this prospecting method is attributed to the use of inappropriate plant tissues, to the mercury in the particular substrate studied existing in a form of low mobility and availability to plants, or to both causes.Prospecting by examining mercury concentrations in soils and rocks (lithogeochemical prospecting) is more effective than the biogeochemical approach only in prospecting for cinnabar deposits having no allochthonous cover. Mercury-biogeochemical prospecting is most effective for non-mercury mineral deposits and for oil and gas deposits. The types of plant tissues used in these studies are listed and are classified according to their value in prospecting. A case history is given of the Ozernoe pyrite-polymetallic deposit in Siberia.