Variable Subunit Contact and Cooperativity of Hemoglobins

Tertiary structures of proteins are conserved better than their primary structures during evolution. Quaternary structures or subunit organizations, however, are not always conserved. A typical case is found in hemoglobin family. Although human, Scapharca, and Urechis have tetrameric hemoglobins, their subunit contacts are completely different from each other. We report here that only one or two amino acid replacements are enough to create a new contact between subunits. Such a small number of chance replacements is expected during the evolution of hemoglobins. This result explains why different modes of subunit interaction evolved in animal hemoglobins. In contrast, certain interactions between subunits are necessary for cooperative oxygen binding. Cooperative oxygen binding is observed often in dimeric and tetrameric hemoglobins. Conformational change of a subunit induced by the first oxygen binding to the heme group is transmitted through the subunit contacts and increases the affinity of the second oxygen. The tetrameric hemoglobins from humans and Scapharca have cooperativity in spite of their different modes of subunit contact, but the one from Urechis does not. The relationship between cooperativity and the mode of subunit contacts is not clear. We compared the atomic interactions at the subunit contact surface of cooperative and non-cooperative tetrameric hemoglobins. We show that heme-contact modules M3–M6 play a key role in the subunit contacts responsible for cooperativity. A module was defined as a contiguous peptide segment having compact conformation and its average length is about 15 amino acid residues. We show that the cooperative hemoglobins have interactins involving at least two pairs of modules among the four heme-contact modules at subunit contact. Received: 12 January 2001 / Accepted: 3 April 2001