Characterisation of glutathione transferases and glutathione peroxidases in pea (Pisum sativum)

Glutathione peroxidases (GPOXs) and glutathione transferases, also termed glutathione S-transferases (GST, EC 2.5.1.18), with activities toward a range of xenobiotic substrates including herbicides, have been characterized in etiolated pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Feltham's First) seedlings. Crude extracts showed high activity toward a range of GST substrates including 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (GSTC activity) and the herbicide fluorodifen (GSTF) but low activities toward chloroacetanilides and atrazine. Treatment of the pea seedlings with the herbicide safener dichlormid selectively increased the activity of GSTC and the GST which detoxified atrazine. This induction was restricted to the roots and was not observed with any of the other GST or GPOX activities. In contrast, treatment with CuCl₂ increased GPOX activity in the root but had no effect on any GST activity, while treatment of epicotyls with elicitors of the phytoalexin response increased GST activity toward ethacrynic acid, but had no effect on other GST or GPOX activities. The major enzymes with GSTC, GSTF and GPOX activities were purified from pea epicotyls 3609-fold, 1431-fold and 1554-fold, respectively. During purification by hydrophobic interaction chromatography and affinity chromatography using S-hexyl-glutathione as ligand all three activities co-eluted but could be partially resolved by anion exchange chromatography and gel filtration chromatography. Both GSTC and GPOX had a molecular mass of 48 kDa and their activities were associated with a similar 27.5-kDa subunit but distinct 29-kDa subunits. GSTF could be resolved into two isoenzymes with molecular masses of 49.5 and 54 kDa. GSTF activity was associated with a unique 30-kDa subunit in addition to 27.5- and 29-kDa peptides, suggesting that the two isoenzymes were composed of differing subunits. These results demonstrate that peas contain multiple GST isoenzymes some of which have GPOX activity and that the various activities are differentially responsive to biotic and abiotic stress.