The appropriate use of carotid endarterectomy

FOR THE FIRST 30 YEARS AFTER CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY WAS FIRST DEVELOPED, anecdotal evidence was used to identify patients with internal carotid artery disease for whom this procedure would be appropriate. More recently, the appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic patients and asymptomatic subjects has emerged from 7 randomized trials. Risk of stroke and benefit from the procedure are greatest for symptomatic patients with at least 70% stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Within this group, carotid endarterectomy is most beneficial for the following patients: otherwise healthy elderly patients, those with hemispheric transient ischemic attack, those with tandem extracranial and intracranial lesions and those without evidence of collateral vessels. Risk of perioperative stroke and death is higher in the following groups, although they still benefit: patients with widespread leukoaraiosis, those with occlusion of the contralateral internal carotid artery and those with intraluminal thrombus. Patients with 50% to 69% stenosis experience lesser benefit, and some other groups may even be harmed by carotid endarterectomy, including women and patients with transient monocular blindness only. The procedure is indicated for patients presenting with lacunar stroke and for those with a nearly occluded internal carotid artery, but the benefit is muted. Patients with less than 50% stenosis do not benefit. In the largest randomized trial of asymptomatic subjects, the perioperative risk of stroke and death was very low (1.5%), but the results indicated that a prohibitively high number of subjects (83) must be treated to prevent one stroke in 2 years. The subsequent literature reported higher perioperative risks (2.8% to 5.6%). In asymptomatic individuals nearly half of the strokes that occur may be due to heart and small-vessel disease. These limitations counter any potential benefit. Another trial is in progress and may identify subgroups of asymptomatic subjects who would benefit. Meanwhile, most individuals without symptoms fare better with medical care.The prevention of ischemic stroke by surgical means goes back half a century. After initial endorsement of carotid endarterectomy, confusion arose as to the appropriate selection of patients and the allowable risk from the procedure. In the past 2 decades large randomized trials have been used to evaluate the benefit of the procedure for patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic disease of the internal carotid artery. Sufficient time has now passed since the publication of these trials to analyze their impact on practice and to make recommendations about the application of carotid endarterectomy. There is strong evidence of benefit in some symptomatic patients, whereas other patients will not benefit and may even face harm. There is weak statistical and weaker clinical evidence that asymptomatic subjects will survive longer without experiencing stroke if they undergo endarterectomy than if they do not. The evidence supporting carotid angioplasty and stenting remains anecdotal and conflicting.The purpose of the present report is to provide a clinical roadmap to which symptomatic patients and asymptomatic subjects with carotid stenosis are candidates for endarterectomy. The risks and complications of endarterectomy are also reported. The outlook and benefit for symptomatic patients and asymptomatic subjects are so different that the evidence supporting appropriate use of endarterectomy in these 2 groups will be presented separately.