Towards harmonious conservation relationships: A framework for understanding protected area staff-local community relationships in developing countries |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK;2. Institute of Biological Sciences and Health, Federal University of Alagoas, Campus A. C. Simões, Av. Lourival Melo Mota, s/n Tabuleiro dos Martins, Maceió, AL, Brazil;3. Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK;4. WWF-UK, Living Planet Centre, Brewery Rd, Woking GU21 4LL, UK;5. Ministry of the Environment of Brazil, Esplanada dos Ministérios, Bloco B, Brasília, Brazil |
| |
Abstract: | This paper conceptualises a framework for assessing protected area (PA)–community relationships and is premised on the view that positive PA–community relationships enhance conservation. A meta-synthesis of existing academic literature with a qualitative orientation was used to review the PA staff-community relationships, and data were analysed using an inductive qualitative approach. From a review of 105 published documents focusing on wildlife conservation, community involvement and PA–community relationships, it emerged that relationships are mostly influenced by attitudes. With the case of PA–community relationships, the question that arises is ‘whose attitude’? The paper proposes that both PA staff attitudes and community attitudes play an important role in shaping these relationships. Based on these findings, we propose a PA–community relationship framework that illuminates the human–wildlife interface as critical space in shaping conservation attitudes. In particular, four major factors affecting PA staff-community relationships were identified: (i) history of creation of the PAs focusing on forced relocation, and the fences and fines approach; (ii) benefits and costs associated with living closer to PAs; (iii) socio-demographic factors in which the influences of sex, age, level of education, number of years stayed in the village, experience accrued from working in PAs, household size, number of livestock, sources of income, and level of income; and (iv) community involvement in conservation-related developmental projects. We conclude that enhanced PA–community relationships promote wildlife conservation through participatory approaches and collaboration between PA staff and communities. We recommend for continued assessment and monitoring of PA staff and community relationships in order to allow for sustainable conservation especially in developing countries. |
| |
Keywords: | Attitudes Community Factors Protected area Tourism Wildlife conservation |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|