| Abstract: | Evidence is presented for separate conduction pathways for swimming and for tentacle coordination in the marginal nerves of the jellyfish Stomotoca. The effector muscles are fired through junctions sensitive to excess Mg++, probably represented by the neuromuscular synapses observed by electron microscopy. The swimming effector (striated muscle) fires one-to-one with nerve input signals and myoid conduction occurs. Tentacle responses (smooth muscle contractions) involve facilitation, presumably at the neuro-effector junction; responses are graded and nonpropagating. Electrical correlates of two further conducting systems using the marginal nerves have been recorded. Their functions are unknown. One, the bridge system, extends up the four radii and encircles the peduncle; the other (ring system) is confined to the margin. A fifth conducting system is inferred in the case of the pointing response and its distribution is plotted. Signals have not been obtained from it. Pointing is accompanied by a burst of muscle potentials in the radial smooth muscles and is exhibited after a lengthy latency, indicating a local pacemaker. A sixth conducting pathway is the epithelial system, which mediates crumpling, a response involving the radial muscles without pacemaker intervention. Characteristic conduction velocities and wave forms are noted for the first four systems and for epithelial pulses. All systems, except perhaps the pointing conduction system, through-conduct under excess Mg++. Spontaneous activity patterns are described for the swimming, tentacle pulse, and ring systems. Abrupt increases in light intensity inhibit spontaneous activity, sudden decreases augmenting it. In the absence of specialized photoreceptors, light is presumed to act directly on central neurons. Epithelial pulses inhibit swimming, apparently by blocking the generation or conduction of the primary nervous events. This observation, taken in conjunction with evidence of feedback inhibition of the primary swimming system by the cells it fires, is discussed in relation to possible mechanisms whereby the output of nerve cells might be altered by activity in the excitable epithelial cells which envelop them. |
