首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Evaluation of lamb performance and costs in motherless rearing of German Grey Heath sheep under field conditions using automatic feeding systems
Authors:D Bimczok  FW Rhl  M Ganter
Institution:

aInstitute of Anatomy, Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany

bDepartment of Biometrics and Bioinformatics, Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany

cClinic for Swine and Small Ruminants, School of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Germany

Abstract:Performance and costs were evaluated for 205 German Grey Heath lambs reared artificially under field conditions using three feeding and three weaning regimes. In phase 1 (pre-weaning), ad libitum feeding of milk replacer (MR) on an automatic lamb feeder was compared to restricted MR feeding on the modified calf feeder “Stand alone II®” or with buckets. In phase 2 (after weaning at 12 kg body weight), abrupt weaning was compared to gradual weaning systems with reduction of the amount or the concentration of MR over 2 weeks. In phase 1, average daily gains (ADG) were highest in the Ad libitum group (0.262 ± 0.032 kg/d), followed by Bucket and Stand alone with 0.227 ± 0.036 kg/d and 0.209 ± 0.023 kg/d, respectively (P < 0.05). In contrast, feed conversion rate was best for group Stand alone (1.17:1), compared to 1.20:1 in group Bucket and 1.23:1 in group Ad libitum. In phase 2, abrupt weaning caused weight loss in lambs from the Ad libitum and Bucket groups, but not in group Stand alone. No post-weaning growth check was seen in lambs weaned gradually. In general, differences in body weight (BW) between groups were low, and on d 70, no significant difference was seen between feeding groups, whereas lambs weaned abruptly still had lower BW than lambs weaned by reducing the amount of MR (P < 0.05). Total lamb mortality was 3.9%, with no accumulation of infectious disease in any of the feeding or weaning groups. Economic analysis revealed that total costs in phase 1 were highest for group Stand alone (57–70 € per lamb), followed by the Bucket group (63 € per lamb). Although MR consumption was higher in the Ad libitum group, this method was the most cost-efficient (50–54 € per lamb), because purchase price of the feeder and labor costs were relatively low. In phase 2, gradual weaning systems added costs of 4.70–9.50 € per lamb. Our findings indicate that the most efficient way to rear 60–120 lambs artificially under field conditions is by using an automatic ad libitum lamb feeder followed by abrupt weaning.
Keywords:Lambs  Artificial rearing  Automatic feeder  Feeding behavior  Costs
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号