Biological indicators provide short term soil health assessment during sodic soil reclamation |
| |
| Institution: | 1. GEGENAA EA3795, SFR Condorcet FR CNRS3417, URCA, Université de Champagne, 2 Esplanade Roland Garros, 51100 Reims, France;2. CNRS FRE 3498 EDYSAN (Écologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés), UPJV, 33 rue St-Leu, 80039 Amiens, France;3. INRA, UMR 1391 ISPA, 71 avenue Edouard Bourlaux, CS 20032, F33882 Villenave-d''Ornon cedex, France;1. North Dakota State University, Department of Soil Science, Fargo, ND 58108, USA;2. South Dakota State University, Department of Plant Science, Brookings, SD 57007, USA;3. North Dakota State University, Department of Agricultural Biosystems Engineering 7620, Fargo, ND 58108, USA;1. Section of Crop and Soil Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA;2. National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA 50011, USA. |
| |
| Abstract: | Sodic soil remediation is an expensive, lengthy process during which producers need tools to demonstrate that sodium (Na+) remediation practices are improving soil health. The objective of this study was to determine if soil biological indicators can provide a short term assessment of the effectiveness of chemical management strategies used to remediate northern Great Plains sodium affected soils. This randomized complete block split-plot research experiment was conducted in a grassland which was converted to annual row crops. The soil at the site was an Exline (fine, smectitic, frigid Leptic Natrudolls). The experiment contained two drainage treatments (tile drained and no-drainage) and four chemical amendments (4.5 Mg ha−1 of gypsum, 9.1 Mg ha−1 of gypsum, 9.1 Mg ha−1 spent sugar beet lime, and a no amendment control). Base-line soil samples for biological assessment were collected in the fall of 2012 after tile drainage was installed. The sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) ranged from 0.4 to 16.7 with a range of electrical conductivity (EC) of 0.4–0.8 dS m−1. Gypsum and lime amendments were applied in 2013. Soil samples were collected for assessing soil health before and after application of amendments and throughout the growing season. This study utilizes a novel application of successional vector trajectories to compare shifts in measured soil health parameters associated with land use change and remediation of sodicity. Soil samples were analyzed for percent total soil carbon (C), nitrifier and denitrifier gene copies, soil enzyme assays (nitrate reductase, ammonia monooxegenase, urease, β glucosidase, alkaline phosphatase, arylsulfatase and fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis), EC, pH, SAR, and soil texture. Gene copies and enzyme activities were successfully used to differentiate between land uses and amendment applications. Ammonia oxidizing bacterial gene copies were higher where cropland was amended with gypsum. Successional vectors verified a significant shift in soil health due to land use change and amendment application. Gypsum applications reduced SAR, but increased soil EC. This work demonstrates that soil enzyme activities and gene copy numbers can be used to detect improvements in soil health. |
| |
| Keywords: | AOA AOB Bioindicators Gene copy numbers Gypsum Nitrification qPCR Remediation Soil enzyme Sodicity Soil health Subsurface tile drainage |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
