Coastal wetland restoration through the lens of Odum's theory of ecosystem development |
| |
Authors: | Friedrich W. Keppeler Annette S. Engel Linda M. Hooper-Bùi Paola C. López-Duarte Charles W. Martin Jill A. Olin Katelyn J. Lamb Michael J. Polito Nancy N. Rabalais Brian J. Roberts Erick M. Swenson Olaf P. Jensen |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Center for Limnology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, U.S.A.;2. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, The University of Tennessee–Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, U.S.A.;3. Department of Environmental Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, U.S.A.;4. Department of Environmental Science and Management, Portland State University, Portland, OR, U.S.A.;5. Stokes School of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Dauphin Island Sea Lab, University of South Alabama, Dauphin Island, Mobile, AL, U.S.A.;6. Department of Biological Sciences, Great Lakes Research Center, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, U.S.A.;7. Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, U.S.A.;8. Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium, Chauvin, LA, U.S.A. |
| |
Abstract: | Advancing ecological restoration assessments requires a more detailed consideration of species interactions and ecosystem processes. Most restoration projects rely on a few metrics not always directly linked with ecological theory. Here, we used Odum's theory of ecosystem development to assess and compare the ecosystem structure and services of created marshes (4–6 years old) with preexisting, reference marshes in a brackish water region of the Mississippi River Delta. We built ecosystem models for created and reference marshes that integrated large datasets of stomach contents, stable isotopes, and taxa abundances. Despite strong resemblance in community structure, created marshes were at an earlier succession stage compared to the reference marshes, having lower biomass (including exploited species), higher biomass turnover and production, less dependence on detritus, lower material cycling, and less energy flowing through specialist pathways. Although preserving preexisting marshes should be a priority, created marshes may still be an important tool for the restoration of coastal areas and their ecosystem services. In addition, our results show that comparisons of species biodiversity alone may fail to capture essential differences in ecosystem processes between habitats, which reinforces the importance of ecosystem modeling approaches to assess restoration projects. |
| |
Keywords: | coastal wetlands ecosystem development ecosystem services Mississippi River delta restoration succession |
|
|