The costs of female choice in a lekking bird

We investigated the costs of active female choice in sage grouse,Centrocercus urophasianus, a lekking species in which femalesmake repeated, lengthy visits to leks to assess males beforemating. Several potential costs were measured by monitoringchanges in hens' ranging behavior, time budgets, and encounterrates with predators when they visited leks. Two costs wereidentified: hens moved further per day and encountered goldeneagles, Aquila chrysaetos, more frequently when visiting leks.However, extra travel due to visiting leks increased predicteddaily energetic expenditure by only about 1%, and the risk ofpredation by golden eagles over a typical series of lek visits(compared to a single short visit for mating) was estimatedto reduce annual survival by <0.1%. Two other potential costswere not supported: visiting leks did not depress foraging timeor conflict with nest defense. These results indicate that anycosts of mate choice are slight and imply that even very smallbenefits could be sufficient to maintain female choice. We presentcalculations which suggest that increased offspring viabilitydue to choosing fitter males could balance predation costs evenif the heritability of fitness is low and if females identifyfitter males with only moderate accuracy. Despite recent emphasison the direct benefits of mate choice, we conclude that eitherindirect or direct benefits could provide a plausible solutionto the lek paradox.