Taxonomic,functional, and phylogenetic dimensions of rodent biodiversity along an extensive tropical elevational gradient |
| |
| Authors: | Lindsay M Dreiss Kevin R Burgio Laura M Cisneros Brian T Klingbeil Bruce D Patterson Steven J Presley Michael R Willig |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Dept of Natural Resources and the Environment, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, USA;2. Dept of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, USA;3. Dept of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Center for Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, USA;4. Integrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | Relationships among taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic dimensions of biodiversity provide insight about the relative contributions of ecological and evolutionary processes in structuring local assemblages. We used data for rodent species distributions from an extensive tropical elevational gradient to 1) describe elevational gradients for each of three dimensions of biodiversity, 2) evaluate the sufficiency of species richness as a surrogate for other dimensions, and 3) quantify the relative support for mechanisms that increase or decrease phylogenetic or functional dispersion. Taxonomic biodiversity was quantified by species richness, as well as by richness, evenness, diversity, dominance, and rarity at generic and familial levels. Morphological and categorical traits were used to estimate functional biodiversity, and an ultrametric mammalian supertree was used as the basis for estimating phylogenetic biodiversity. Elevational gradients of each dimension of biodiversity were strong, with significant linear and non‐linear components based on orthogonal polynomial regression. Empirical linear and non‐linear regression components were consistently different than those expected based on species richness for generic, familial, and phylogenetic biodiversity, but not for functional biodiversity. Nevertheless, the congruence of dimensions of biodiversity based on correlation analyses indicated that any one dimension is a useful surrogate for the other dimensions for rodents at Manu. Given variation in species richness, assemblages from lowland rainforests comprised more biodiversity than expected, whereas assemblages from cloud and elfin forests represented less biodiversity than expected. Warm temperatures, vertical complexity of the vegetation, and high productivity likely facilitate niche differentiation in rainforests, whereas cricetid rodents are competitively superior to other clades in the less structurally complex, less productive, and colder, high elevation habitats. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
