Reliability of FEV1/FEV6 to Diagnose Airflow Obstruction Compared with FEV1/FVC: The PLATINO Longitudinal Study

QUESTION

A 6-second spirometry test is easier than full exhalations. We compared the reliability of the ratio of the Forced expiratory volume in 1 second/Forced expiratory volume in 6 seconds (FEV₁/FEV₆) to the ratio of the FEV₁/Forced vital capacity (FEV₁/FVC) for the detection of airway obstruction.

METHODS

The PLATINO population-based survey in individuals aged 40 years and over designed to estimate the prevalence of post-Bronchodilator airway obstruction repeated for the same study participants after 5–9 years in three Latin-American cities.

RESULTS

Using the FEV₁/FVC<Lower limit of normal (LLN) index, COPD prevalence apparently changed from 9.8 to 13.2% in Montevideo, from 9.7 to 6.0% in São Paulo and from 8.5 to 6.6% in Santiago, despite only slight declines in smoking prevalence (from 30.8% to 24.3%). These changes were associated with differences in Forced expiratory time (FET) between the two surveys. In contrast, by using the FEV₁/FEV₆ to define airway obstruction, the changes in prevalence were smaller: 9.7 to 10.6% in Montevideo, 8.6 to 9.0% in São Paulo, and 7.5 to 7.9% in Santiago. Changes in the prevalence of COPD with criteria based on FEV₁/FVC correlated strongly with changes in the FET of the tests (R² 0.92) unlike the prevalence based on a low FEV₁/FEV₆ (R² = 0.40).

CONCLUSION

The FEV₁/FEV₆ is a more reliable index than FEV₁/FVC because FVC varies with the duration of the forced exhalation. Reporting FET and FEV₁/FEV₆<LLN helps to understand differences in prevalence of COPD obtained from FEV₁/FVC-derived indices.