Two New Computational Methods for Universal DNA Barcoding: A Benchmark Using Barcode Sequences of Bacteria,Archaea, Animals,Fungi, and Land Plants |
| |
| Authors: | Akifumi S Tanabe Hirokazu Toju |
| |
| Institution: | 1Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan;2Research Center for Aquatic Genomics, National Research Institute of Fisheries Science, Fisheries Research Agency, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan;3Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan;Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Italy |
| |
| Abstract: | Taxonomic identification of biological specimens based on DNA sequence information (a.k.a. DNA barcoding) is becoming increasingly common in biodiversity science. Although several methods have been proposed, many of them are not universally applicable due to the need for prerequisite phylogenetic/machine-learning analyses, the need for huge computational resources, or the lack of a firm theoretical background. Here, we propose two new computational methods of DNA barcoding and show a benchmark for bacterial/archeal 16S, animal COX1, fungal internal transcribed spacer, and three plant chloroplast (rbcL, matK, and trnH-psbA) barcode loci that can be used to compare the performance of existing and new methods. The benchmark was performed under two alternative situations: query sequences were available in the corresponding reference sequence databases in one, but were not available in the other. In the former situation, the commonly used “1-nearest-neighbor” (1-NN) method, which assigns the taxonomic information of the most similar sequences in a reference database (i.e., BLAST-top-hit reference sequence) to a query, displays the highest rate and highest precision of successful taxonomic identification. However, in the latter situation, the 1-NN method produced extremely high rates of misidentification for all the barcode loci examined. In contrast, one of our new methods, the query-centric auto-k-nearest-neighbor (QCauto) method, consistently produced low rates of misidentification for all the loci examined in both situations. These results indicate that the 1-NN method is most suitable if the reference sequences of all potentially observable species are available in databases; otherwise, the QCauto method returns the most reliable identification results. The benchmark results also indicated that the taxon coverage of reference sequences is far from complete for genus or species level identification in all the barcode loci examined. Therefore, we need to accelerate the registration of reference barcode sequences to apply high-throughput DNA barcoding to genus or species level identification in biodiversity research. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
