Intersexual spatial relationships in a lekking species: blue-crowned manakins and female hot spots

Leks offer an intriguing evolutionary problem: why do malesaggregate when this apparently leads to fitness costs? Aggregationcosts can be balanced if males settle on patches where theyare more likely to encounter females (hot-spot hypothesis).We evaluated whether female hot spots can account for patternsof lek structure in the blue-crowned manakin (Lepidothrix coronata)by modeling female distribution patterns relative to lek locationsin two 100-ha plots. Individual females were mapped based onnest locations and capture points and had their home ranges(HRs) modeled based on radiotelemetry data. The number of femalesthat lekking males can be expected to encounter was estimatedas the number of individual female HRs overlapping each maleterritory; hot spots were defined as patches where more femalesare found than average. We investigated how changes in femaleHR size and devaluation effects (decrease in female availabilitydue to the presence of neighboring males) influence male accessto females. Both factors strongly influenced the expected ratesof female encounter, but the hot-spot hypothesis was not supported:most male territories consistently overlapped fewer or justas many female HRs as expected by chance. Leks were not closerto hot spots than similar-sized nonlek sites. A proportion ofmales were, indeed, settled at hot spots, but, contrary to predictionsof the hot-spot hypothesis, they belonged to smaller leks thanmales located outside hot spots. Our results indicate that thislack of spatial correlation between males and females resultspartly from differences in sex-specific habitat preferences.