首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Ring chromosome 15: characterization by array CGH
Authors:Ian A Glass  Katherine A Rauen  Emily Chen  Jillian Parkes  Donna G Alberston  Daniel Pinkel  Philip D Cotter
Institution:(1) Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, M2-9, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98105, USA;(2) Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA;(3) Department of Genetics, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Oakland, CA, USA;(4) Queensland Clinical Genetics Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia;(5) Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA;(6) Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pathology, Children’s Hospital and Research Center at Oakland, 747 Fifty Second Street, Oakland, CA, USA
Abstract:Ring chromosome 15 r(15)] is an uncommon finding with less than 50 patients reported. Precise genotype–phenotype correlations are problematic because of the difficulties in determining the extent of euchromatic loss, the level of mosaicism, and the influence of the timing of ascertainment. We report two discordant examples of r(15) patients. In the first case, prenatal diagnosis of a de novo r(15) was made during the second trimester: mos 46,XX,r(15)(p11.2q26)32]/45,XX,-1513]/47,XX,r(15)(p11.2q26)x23]/46,XX,dic r(15)(p11.2q26p11.2q261]/46,XX2]. Postnatal follow-up revealed extremely small stature, heart defects, and developmental delay. Patient 2 was a 31-year-old short-statured female who was living independently: 46,XX,r(15)(p11q26). Both cases showed loss of the 15q subtelomeric region by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). To investigate the discordance in phenotypes between the two patients, we undertook array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) analyses to more fully characterize the deletions associated with these otherwise structurally indistinguishable r(15) chromosomes from conventional cytogenetic analyses and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies. By array CGH, patient 1 showed deletion of multiple contiguous clones predicting an approximately 6 Mb deletion of distal 15q. In contrast, patient 2 showed loss of just the 15q subtelomeric clone and an interstitial clone by array CGH confirming that the severity of the phenotype correlated with the size of the deletion at the molecular level. These cases illustrate the utility of array CGH characterization for determining the size of the associated deletion in ring chromosomes and for facilitating phenotype–genotype correlations.
Keywords:Chromosome 15  Genotype–  phenotype correlation  Ring chromosome  Postnatal phenotype  Prenatal diagnosis  Array CGH
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号