Comparison of the epifauna spatial distribution in Posidonia oceanica,Cymodocea nodosa and unvegetated bottoms: Importance of meadow edges |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, West Hoe, Plymouth PL1 3DH, UK;2. Centre for Fish and Fisheries Research, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia;1. Oceanography Section, Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e di Geofisica Sperimentale, OGS I-34151 Trieste, Italy;2. Institute for Biological Resources and Marine Biotechnologies (IRBIM), Italian National Research Council (CNR), Largo Fiera della Pesca 1, 60125 Ancona, Italy;3. Department of Biomolecular Sciences (DiSB), University of Urbino ‘Carlo Bo’, loc. Crocicchia, 61029 Urbino, Italy;4. National Institute of Biology, Marine Biology Station Piran, Fornace 41, SI-6330 Piran, Slovenia;5. Fano Marine Center, The Inter-Institute Center for Research on Marine Biodiversity, Resources and Biotechnologies, 61032 Fano, Italy;6. Consorzio Nazionale Interuniversitario per le Scienze del Mare (CoNISMa) Rome, URL-Centro Direzionale—Isola C4, 80143 Napoli, Italy |
| |
Abstract: | In order to detect the influence of seagrass, the most important habitats of shallow soft-bottom along the Mediterranean coast, on spatial distribution of epifauna, four different types of habitat were sampled: Posidonia oceanica, Cymodocea nodosa, edge of Posidonia meadow and sandy bottoms. Sampling was carried out, using the hand net method, in various random sites and at different times (April 95, August 95 and February 96) on the Alicante coast (SE Spain). A double taxonomic approach was used in order to detect spatial and temporal changes in the abundance of the main taxonomic groups and amphipod species. The differences among habitats were detected by non-parametric multidimensional scaling (MDS) for community structure and by analysis of variance for groups and amphipod populations. The community structure defined by the abundance of taxonomic groups was not significantly modified by the habitats. Single abundance of taxonomic groups also had no significant preference for the type of habitat except in the case of Acari, a group linked to Posidonia. However, certain trends of preference, such as mysids on Posidonia edge and isopods on Cymodocea, were detectable. On other hand, the amphipod assemblage showed important differences among habitats. Some species changed significantly in abundance depending on the habitat considered, e.g. Dexamine spiniventris and Perioculodes longimanus. It was possible to conclude that there is an important influence of Posidonia and Cymodocea on epifauna distribution by diversification of habitat structure on sandy bottoms, but it was more important at the species level than when considering taxonomic groups. Furthermore, sandy bottoms and the meadow edges had a relatively high importance on fauna distribution, depending on taxa and the period of the year. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|