首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Evaluation of cyst loss in standard procedural steps for detecting ofGiardia lamblia andCryptosporidium parvum in water
Authors:Kyung-Ju Kim  Hyang-Hee Jung  Kisay Lee
Institution:(1) School of Biotechnology and Environmental Engineering, Myongji University, 449-728 Yongin, Korea
Abstract:The standard procedure outlined by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) in Method 1623 for analyzingGiardia lamblia cysts andCryptosporidium parvum oocysts in water samples consists of filtration, elution, centrifugal concentration, immunomagnetic separation (IMS), and immunofluorescence assay (IFA) followed by microscopic examination. In this study, the extent of (oo)cyst loss in each step of this procedure was evaluated by comparing recovery yields in segmented analyses: (i) IMS+IFA, (ii) concentration +IMS+IFA, and (iii) filtration/elution + concentration +IMS+IFA. The complete (oo)cyst recovery by the full procedure was 52–57%. The (oo)cyst loss in the IMS step was only 0–6%, implying that IMS is a fairly reliable method for (oo)cyst purification. Centrifugal concentration of the eluted sample and pellet collection before IMS resulted in a loss of 8–14% of the (oo)cysts. The largest (oo)cyst loss occurred in the elution step, with 68–71% of the total loss. The permeated loss of (oo)cysts was negligible during filtration of the water sample with a 1.0-μm pore polyethersulfone (PES) capsule. These results demonstrated that the largest fraction of (oo)cyst loss in this procedure occurred due to poor elution from the filter matrix. Improvements in the elution methodology are therefore required to enhance the overall recovery yield and the reliability of the detection of these parasitic protozoa.
Keywords:Cryptosporidium parvum                      Giardia lamblia            detection and analysis  Method 1623  (oo)cysts  recovery loss
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号