首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Status of Charidotis pygmaea (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) as a Biological Control Agent of Lantana montevidensis (Verbenaceae) in Australia
Institution:1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA;2. Urology Section, University of Catania, Catania, Italy;3. Departments of Laboratory Medicine, Surgery, and Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA;4. Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA;5. Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands;6. Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA;7. Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA;1. Epsom and St. Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK;2. Senior Epidemiologist, Ottawa Public Health, Canada;1. Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands;2. Department of Medical Ethics and Health Law, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
Abstract:The establishment of the leaf-feeding beetle Charidotis pygmaea Klug and its potential to control Lantana montevidensis (Sprengel) Briquet, a serious pasture weed of central and southern Queensland, Australia, were assessed. C. pygmaea was collected in Brazil from Lantana fucata Lindley, a plant morphologically similar to L. montevidensis. Over 40,000 beetles were released over 3 years by use of caged and uncaged techniques at 25 sites throughout southeast and central Queensland. At 6 of the sites where detailed and frequent monitoring occurred, no adults were found 6 months after the release. At another 2 sites, adults were present for only 12 months. Only a small number of eggs were laid at any single site and few larvae completed development to the adult stage. No signs of insect activity were found at any site after 24 months. Comparative laboratory and experimental field plot trials with both the weedy (field host) and the ornamental (glasshouse host) forms of L. montevidensis did not show significant differences in insect performance. Assessment of nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, and water contents, leaf hairiness, and leaf toughness of both the weedy and the ornamental forms of L. montevidensis grown under glasshouse and field plot conditions did not show differences between the two plant forms. There were, however, differences in the percentage of adults that developed in the glasshouse trials compared to the field plot trials (55% vs 5%). Field observations in Brazil showed that C. pygmaea was found only on L. fucata and L. tiliifolia Chamisso and was not seen on L. montevidensis growing in the same region. Climate matching with CLIMEX showed that most areas in Australia where L. montevidensis is a major problem are not climatically similar to the collection sites of C. pygmaea in Brazil. Whereas populations of C. pygmaea can be maintained on L. montevidensis under glasshouse conditions, it performs poorly on that species under field conditions. Unsuitable climatic conditions and an incompatible target plant are the most likely factors affecting the poor performance of C. pygmaea. Consequently, field releases of the agent in Australia have ceased and C. pygmaea is not recommended as a biological control agent for L. montevidensis in Australia.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号