Affiliation: | (1) Department of Biology, Queen s University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada;(2) University of Cambridge, Department of Zoology, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK;(3) Fakultät für Biologie, Universität Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany |
Abstract: | We presented free-flying locusts (Locusta migratoria L.) with sounds that varied in temporal structure and carrier frequency as they flew toward a light source in a flight room under controlled temperature and light conditions. Previous studies have shown tethered locusts react more often to trains of 30-kHz pulses than to pulse trains below 10 kHz. Further, this acoustic startle response has been suggested to function in bat-avoidance. We expected free-flying locusts to respond similarly; however, we found locusts responded to all sounds we presented, not just high-frequency, bat-like sounds. Response rates of turns, loops, and dives varied from 6% to 26% but were statistically independent of carrier frequency and/or pulse structure. Free-flying moths and tethered locusts were tested using a subset of our acoustic stimuli under the same temperature and light conditions as the free-flying locusts. Moth responses were carrier frequency dependent as were responses of tethered locusts positioned along the flight path observed in our free-flight trials. All responses were unaffected by a 90% reduction in room light. We conclude that locusts possess an acoustic startle response evocable in free flight, however, free-flying locusts do not show the same discrimination observed in tethered locusts under similar conditions.Abbreviations ASR acoustic startle response - dB SPL decibel sound pressure level (RMS re: 20 Pa) |