DNA repair modulates the vulnerability of the developing brain to alkylating agents |
| |
| Authors: | G.E. Kisby A. Olivas T. Park M. Churchwell D. Doerge L.D. Samson S.L. Gerson M.S. Turker |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Center for Research on Occupational and Environmental Toxicology (CROET), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, United States;2. National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR), Jefferson, AR, United States;3. Biological Engineering Division, Center for Environmental Health Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States;4. Case Western Reserve University, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, United States;1. Biological Engineering Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States;2. Biology Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States;3. Center for Environmental Health Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States;4. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States;5. Rodent Histopathology Core, Harvard Medical School, 126 Goldenson Building, Boston, MA 02115, United States;1. Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University “A. Avogadro”, Via Solaroli, 17, 28100 Novara, Italy;2. Department of Mental Health, ASL NO, Centre of Mental Health, Viale Zoppis, 8, 28021 Borgomanero, Novara, Italy;3. Interdisciplinary Research Center of Autoimmune Diseases (IRCAD), School of Medicine, Novara, Italy;1. Plant Breeding, Genetics and Biotechnology, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines;2. Crop and Environmental Sciences Division, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines;3. Department of Phytomedicine, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany;4. Plant Production and Climate Change, Erfurt University of Applied Sciences, Erfurt, Germany;1. Center for Healthy Aging, SUND, University of Copenhagen, Denmark;2. Laboratory of Molecular Gerontology, National Institute on Aging, 251 Bayview Blvd, Baltimore, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | ![]()
Neurons of the developing brain are especially vulnerable to environmental agents that damage DNA (i.e., genotoxicants), but the mechanism is poorly understood. The focus of the present study is to demonstrate that DNA damage plays a key role in disrupting neurodevelopment. To examine this hypothesis, we compared the cytotoxic and DNA damaging properties of the methylating agents methylazoxymethanol (MAM) and dimethyl sulfate (DMS) and the mono- and bifunctional alkylating agents chloroethylamine (CEA) and nitrogen mustard (HN2), in granule cell neurons derived from the cerebellum of neonatal wild type mice and three transgenic DNA repair strains. Wild type cerebellar neurons were significantly more sensitive to the alkylating agents DMS and HN2 than neuronal cultures treated with MAM or the half-mustard CEA. Parallel studies with neuronal cultures from mice deficient in alkylguanine DNA glycosylase (Aag?/?) or O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (Mgmt?/?), revealed significant differences in the sensitivity of neurons to all four genotoxicants. Mgmt?/? neurons were more sensitive to MAM and HN2 than the other genotoxicants and wild type neurons treated with either alkylating agent. In contrast, Aag?/? neurons were for the most part significantly less sensitive than wild type or Mgmt?/? neurons to MAM and HN2. Aag?/? neurons were also significantly less sensitive than wild type neurons treated with either DMS or CEA. Granule cell development and motor function were also more severely disturbed by MAM and HN2 in Mgmt?/? mice than in comparably treated wild type mice. In contrast, cerebellar development and motor function were well preserved in MAM-treated Aag?/? or MGMT-overexpressing (MgmtTg+) mice, even as compared with wild type mice suggesting that AAG protein increases MAM toxicity, whereas MGMT protein decreases toxicity. Surprisingly, neuronal development and motor function were severely disturbed in MgmtTg+ mice treated with HN2. Collectively, these in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrate that the type of DNA lesion and the efficiency of DNA repair are two important factors that determine the vulnerability of the developing brain to long-term injury by a genotoxicant. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
