首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


The canary in the coal mine: Sprouts as a rapid indicator of browse impact in managed forests
Institution:1. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, P.O. Box 267, Irvine, PA 16329-0267, USA;2. University of Georgia, Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, USA;1. Marine Scotland Science Freshwater Fisheries Laboratory, Faskally, Pitlochry, Perthshire PH16 5LB, Scotland, UK;2. Marine Scotland Science Marine Laboratory, PO Box 101, 375, Victoria Road, Aberdeen AB11 9DB, Scotland, UK;1. Department of Earth Sciences, University of Durham, DH1 3LE, UK;2. Department of Geography, University of Durham, DH1 3LE, UK;1. Department of Forest Management, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT 59812, USA;2. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 1221 South Main, Moscow, ID 83843, USA;1. Grupo de Investigación en Ecofisiología de Fauna Silvestre (GIEFAS), CCT Patagonia Norte-CONICET, Asentamiento Universitario San Martín de los Andes (AUSMA), Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Pje de la Paz 235, 8370, San Martín de los Andes, Neuquén, Argentina;2. INTA EEA Cuenca del Salado AER Maipú. Belgrano 696, 7160, Maipú, Buenos Aires, Argentina;3. INTA EEA Cuenca del Salado AER Dolores. Martín Campos 220, 7100, Dolores, Buenos Aires, Argentina;4. Administración de Parques Nacionales (APN), Manuel Lainez 1171, 7103, General Lavalle, Buenos Aires, Argentina;1. Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, Centre National d’Études et de Recherche Appliquée Faune de Montagne, 5 allée de Bethléem, Z.I. Mayencin, 38610 Gières, France;2. Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive, UMR-CNRS 5558, Université de Lyon, Univ. Lyon 1, 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France;3. Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, Centre National d’Études et de Recherche Appliquée Cervidés-Sanglier, 1 Place Exelmans, F-55000 Bar-le-Duc, France;1. Gulf Organization for Research and Development, Qatar Science and Technology Park, Doha, Qatar;2. Department of Applied Biology, Faculty of Science and Research Academy, University of Sharjah, UAE
Abstract:Forest managers are frequently confronted with sustaining vegetation diversity and structure in landscapes experiencing high ungulate browsing pressure. Often, managers monitor browse damage and risk to plant communities using vegetation as indicators (i.e., phytoindicators). Although useful, the efficacy of traditional phytoindicators is sometimes hampered by limited distribution and abundance, variable browse susceptibility, and lagged responses. In contrast, sprouts possess traits which make them readily available and attractive to browsers, yet fairly resilient to tissue loss. Here, we experimentally evaluate whether hardwood tree stump sprouts are effective and sensitive phytoindicators of deer browse pressure. We measured sprout abundance and height in fenced and unfenced plots at 17 shelterwood harvested sites scattered across a 6500 km2 region where deer densities varied by nearly an order of magnitude. We found browsing did not alter the proportion of stumps sprouting and sprout density; however, browse pressure varied among the four most abundant species. Acer rubrum and Acer saccharum were heavily browsed, although browse pressure on A. saccharum decreased in areas with greater canopy openness. Fagus grandifolia and Prunus serotina were less preferred. Differences in palatability altered size hierarchies. Averaged across all species, browsing reduced sprout height by 39%, relative to protected sprouts. Under ambient browsing, P. serotina was 60–100% taller than other species and significantly taller than A. saccharum and F. grandifolia. However, within fences A. saccharum and A. rubrum doubled in size, relative to browsed individuals, and were as tall as P. serotina. Deer impact on sprout height within unfenced forest stands was negatively correlated with estimated deer densities (R2 = 0.46). Thus, we suggest sprout surveys can provide a measure of impact across much larger areas. Our results demonstrate that sprouts, particularly those of Acer species, offer an abundant, easily measured, and reliable indicator of browse pressure. Moreover, browse impacts on sprouts emerged before impacts were detected on seedling abundance, height, or biomass. We argue sprouts can warn of imminent browse risk to seedlings (and perhaps non-woody vegetation) and thereby allow managers to take actions to mitigate or avert losses to the regenerating seedling cohort.
Keywords:Deer  Herbivory  Stump sprout  Disturbance
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号