首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Seeing the forest for its multiple ecosystem services: Indicators for cultural services in heterogeneous forests
Institution:1. Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Ste. Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, 21111 Lakeshore H9X3V9, Canada;2. Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, 2424 Main Mall V6 T 1Z4, Canada;1. Geography Department, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada;2. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, 506 West Burnside Road, Victoria, BC, V8Z 1M5, Canada;3. Biology Department, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, V8W 3R4, Canada;1. University of Campinas, Laboratory of Environmental Planning (LAPLA/DRH/FEC), CP 6021, CEP 13083-970, Campinas (SP), Brazil;2. University of São Paulo, Laboratory of Landscape Ecology and Conservation (LEPAC/IB/USP), Rua do Matão, 321–Travessa 14, CEP 05508-090, São Paulo, Brazil;3. University of Campinas, Laboratory of Environmental Planning (LAPLA/DRH/FEC), CP 6021, CEP 13083-970, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil;1. Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, (VA), Italy;2. Finnish Environment Institute SYKE, P.O. Box 140, FI-00251 Helsinki, Finland;3. Aarhus University, Department of Environmental Science, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark;4. ALTERRA, Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands;5. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Lancaster, Lancashire LA1 4AP, United Kingdom;1. CREAF, E08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Catalonia, Spain;2. Department of Geography, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, United Kingdom;3. Catalan Ornithological Institute, Natural History Museum of Barcelona, 08019 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain;4. Forest Sciences Centre of Catalonia (CEMFOR-CTFC), 25280 Solsona, Catalonia, Spain;5. Department of Crop and Forest Sciences, Universitat de Lleida-Agrotecnio Center (UdL-Agrotecnio), Av. Rovira Roure, 191, E-25198 Lleida, Catalonia, Spain;6. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), 08193 Cerdanyola del Valles, Catalonia, Spain;7. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, E08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Catalonia, Spain;1. Department of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, United States;2. Urban Systems Lab, Environmental Studies Department, The New School, New York City, NY 10011, United States;3. Heart of the Rockies Initiative, 120 Hickory Street, Suite B, Missoula, Montana 59801, United States;1. Leibniz University Hannover, Institute for Environmental Planning, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, 30419 Hannover, Germany;2. Ruhr University Bochum, Institute of Geography, Universitätsstr. 150, 44805 Bochum, Germany
Abstract:The ecosystem service (ES) framework is gaining traction in ecosystem management as a means to recognize the multiple benefits that ecosystems provide. In forested ecosystems, many structural attributes (trees, understory plants and woody debris) create heterogeneous ecosystems that provide numerous ecosystem services, including many that are culturally important. However, application of the ES framework to forest management is challenged by difficulties measuring and comparing multiple ES across diverse and heterogeneous forest conditions. Indicators can help bring the ES approach to forest management by providing a means for accurate ES inventory and mapping. We measured 10 forest ES in contrasting forest types to investigate the effects of past forest harvesting in coastal temperate rainforest of Vancouver Island, BC, Canada. Our objectives were to build a systematic set of ES indicators for coastal temperate forests based on forest structural features, including trees, coarse woody debris, and understory plants. To achieve this, we 1) analyzed field data to compare the effects of forest age (old-growth vs. second-growth) and ecological site conditions (riparian vs. upland forest) on the bundle of ES provided by different forest types; and 2) worked with a local indigenous wood carver to identify attributes of cedar trees (Thuja plicata) essential for traditional uses, including canoe carving. Forest age and forest type had significant and major effects on bundles of ES. Old-growth forests provided three times higher carbon storage, nine times higher wood volume, and eighteen times higher canopy habitat services than recovering forests. Within old-growth forests, the proportion of trees suitable for traditional indigenous wood carving was significantly higher in riparian stands. Yet of 456 trees measured, only 17 were cedar with potential traditional uses. Of those, trees for canoe carving were the least frequent (n = 3), which we identified as large (>110 cm DBH) trees of exceptional quality. In general, old-growth riparian forests were a hotspot of ES, providing for example nearly three times as much carbon storage as old-growth forests on upland sites and 12 times the amount of carbon storage as found in second-growth forests on upland sites. These results indicate that typical inventories of forest ES, which usually generalize across heterogeneity, may oversimplify dramatic variations in ES bundles in forested landscapes. Our novel set of stand-level ES indicators can improve the accuracy of ES assessments, incorporate important cultural ES, and help address the role of landscape heterogeneity in influencing ES.
Keywords:Ecosystem service  Heterogeneous forest  Forest structural attribute  Coastal temperate forest  British columbia  Traditional ecological knowledge
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号