国家重点生态功能区转移支付与生态环境保护的协同性分析

针对国家重点生态功能区转移支付在资金分配方面存在的不足,选择享受重点生态功能区转移支付的县(市、区)作为典型县域,利用方差分析法和耦合协调度模型,分析了重点生态功能区转移支付与生态环境保护的协同性。结果表明,2017年,不同省份、不同类型生态功能区之间典型县域的生态环境保护支出、环境污染治理支出、生态保护修复支出均存在显著差异(P0.05),但是典型县域获得的重点生态功能区转移支付金额无显著性差异(P0.05),典型县域重点生态功能区转移支付金额与其生态环境保护支出在地域差异和类型差异上不具备协同性;典型县域及其所属各省、各类生态功能区获得的重点生态功能区转移支付金额与生态环境保护支出、环境污染治理支出、生态保护修复支出的耦合协调度均小于0.4,典型县域及其所属各省、各类生态功能区的重点生态功能区转移支付金额与生态环境保护支出均处于失调状态。从典型县域看,当前重点生态功能区转移支付资金分配尚未体现重点生态功能区生态环境保护投入的地域差异和类型差异,也未体现与重点生态功能区生态环境保护投入的协同性,亟需完善重点生态功能区转移支付资金分配机制。

Synergic relationship between transfer payment to national key ecological function areas and eco-environmental protection

According to deficiencies in design and practice of transfer payment to national key ecological function areas, 140 typical counties which received transfer payment to national key ecological function areas were selected in Gansu, Guizhou, Heilongjiang, Hebei, Anhui and Hainan provinces. The interregional synergy and the coupling coordination degree were analyzed for transfer payment to national key ecological function areas and eco-environmental protection expenditure in typical counties of different provinces and different ecological function areas. The results showed that there was significant difference (P<0.05) in the eco-environmental protection expenditure, pollution control expenditure, and the ecological restoration expenditure of typical counties in different provinces or different ecological function areas. The difference between transfer payment of typical counties in different provinces or different ecological function areas was not significant (P>0.05). In terms of the regional difference and type difference, there was no synergy between transfer payment to key ecological function areas and eco-environmental protection expenditure of typical counties. The coupling coordination degree between transfer payment and the eco-environmental protection expenditure, pollution control expenditure, and the ecological restoration expenditure in typical counties, provinces and ecological function areas was less than 0.4. The coupling coordination status between transfer payment and the eco-environmental protection expenditure was imbalance in the typical counties, provinces and ecological function areas in 2017. At present, the regional difference and type difference of eco-environmental protection expenditure was not be reflected for the fund allocation of transfer payment to national key ecological function areas, The synergy with eco-environmental protection expenditure was not reflected too. Further research is needed to innovate and improve fund allocation of transfer payment to national key ecological function areas.