首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于过程模型CROBAS的全局灵敏度分析方法比较
引用本文:薛海连,田相林,王彬,孙帅超,曹田健. 基于过程模型CROBAS的全局灵敏度分析方法比较[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1): 134-144. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202101.005
作者姓名:薛海连  田相林  王彬  孙帅超  曹田健
作者单位:1.西北农林科技大学, 陕西杨凌 712100;2.青海大学农林科学院, 西宁 810016;3.福建农林大学, 福州 350002
基金项目:全国森林经营样板基地科技支撑专项(1692016-07);国家自然科学基金项目(31670646)资助。
摘    要:过程机理模型在开发过程中常受限于生理学参数无法直接或准确测量.全局灵敏度分析可以评估模型预测结果对于生理学参数变化的响应,为模型结构改进、数据收集和参数校准提供参考.本研究基于过程模型CROBAS,以华山松为例,选取模型中描述树木结构关系的10个参数,以树高和各器官生物量的Nash-Sutcliffe效率(NSE)为目...

关 键 词:过程模型  全局灵敏度  Morris  Sobol  EFAST
收稿时间:2020-06-02

Comparison of global sensitivity analysis techniques based on a process-based model CROBAS
XUE Hai-lian,TIAN Xiang-lin,WANG Bin,SUN Shuai-chao,CAO Tian-jian. Comparison of global sensitivity analysis techniques based on a process-based model CROBAS[J]. The journal of applied ecology, 2021, 32(1): 134-144. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202101.005
Authors:XUE Hai-lian  TIAN Xiang-lin  WANG Bin  SUN Shuai-chao  CAO Tian-jian
Affiliation:1.Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;2.Academy of Agriculture and Forestry, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China;3.Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
Abstract:Constructions of process or mechanistic models are limited by physiological parameters,due to difficulty in direct and precise measurement.Global sensitivity analysis could evaluate the response of model outputs to changes in physiological parameters,and provide information for improving model structure,data collection,and parameter calibration.Based on a process model CROBAS,10 parameters related to tree structure of Pinus armandii were selected to compare three widely used global sensitivity analysis methods(the Morris screening method,the variance-based Sobol indices,and the Extended Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test(EFAST)),with the objective function formulated by the Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency(NSE)of tree height and biomass.The results showed that the sensitivity order of parameters slightly varied across different methods,which considerably changed with different objective functions.Both the Morris method and the EFAST method outperformed the Sobol method in terms of time consuming and convergence efficiency.All outputs were sensitive to the maximum rate of canopy photosynthesis per unit area,the specific leaf area,and the extinction coefficient.The light interception of tree canopy played a key role in the simulation of tree growth with CROBAS,suggesting that the module of photosynthetic carbon fixation took priority over any other modules for data collection and model validation during module calibration and tree growth simulation for CROBAS.The calculation and validation of foliage biomass module were crucial when applying carbon balance theory to biomass simulations.In conclusion,for the sensitivity analysis of a complex process-based model,the Morris method was suitable for qualitative studies,while the EFAST method was recommended for quantitative studies.
Keywords:process-based model  global sensitivity  Morris  Sobol  EFAST
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号