Winning and losing: causes for variability in outcome of fights in male Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus)

Game theory models predict that fighting ability should be moreimportant in contest outcome when the payoffs of winning arehigh for both contestants, and ownership should be more importantwhen payoffs are low. Male Magellanic penguins (Spheniscusmagellanicus) provide an opportunity to test these predictionsin a natural setting because payoffs of winning are higherfor penguins fighting before egg laying and lower for penguinsfighting after egg laying, allowing the prediction of differencesin who should win and lose. We watched an area of approximately2000 Magellanic penguin nests from 1992 to 1996 at Punta Tombobreeding colony, Argentina; we quantified fighting behavior,banded contestants, measured their body size (here used as anindex of fighting ability), determined ownership status whenpossible, and monitored their reproductive success. We determinedthat male Magellanic penguins fought for nests and mates. Astheory predicts, before egg laying, body size difference wasmore important than ownership as a predictor of contest outcomeand fight duration. After egg laying, owners won fights, andsize did not predict who won or how long they fought. Our comparisonsof nest ownership, nest quality, and chicks fledged by winnersand losers suggested that our predictions on the change inbenefits of winning before and after egg laying were correct.We conclude that game theory models are useful in predictingwho won or lost fights in male Magellanic penguins and thatultimate benefits of winning fights are related to fitness.