| Abstract: | Pedersen, O. F., T. F. Pedersen, and M. R. Miller. Gascompression in lungs decreases peak expiratory flow depending onresistance of peak flowmeter. J. Appl.Physiol. 83(5): 1517-1521, 1997. It has recentlybeen shown (O. F. Pedersen T. R. Rasmussen, Ø. Omland, T. Sigsgaard, P. H. Quanjer, and M. R. Miller. Eur. Respir. J. 9: 828-833, 1996) that the addedresistance of a mini-Wright peak flowmeter decreases peak expiratoryflow (PEF) by ~8% compared with PEF measured by a pneumotachograph.To explore the reason for this, 10 healthy men (mean age 43 yr, range33-58 yr) were examined in a body plethysmograph with facilitiesto measure mouth flow vs. expired volume as well as the change inthoracic gas volume (Vb) and alveolar pressure(PA). The subjects performed forced vital capacity maneuvers through orifices of different sizes andalso a mini-Wright peak flowmeter. PEF with the meter and other addedresistances were achieved when flow reached the perimeter of theflow-Vb curves. The mini-Wright PEF meter decreased PEF from 11.4 ± 1.5 to 10.3 ± 1.4 (SD) l/s(P < 0.001),PA increased from 6.7 ± 1.9 to 9.3 ± 2.7 kPa (P < 0.001), anincrease equal to the pressure drop across the meter, and caused Vb atPEF to decrease by 0.24 ± 0.09 liter(P < 0.001). We conclude that PEF obtained with an added resistance like a mini-Wright PEF meter is awave-speed-determined maximal flow, but the added resistance causes gascompression because of increasedPA at PEF. Therefore, Vb at PEFand, accordingly, PEF decrease. |
